BSCU vs. FLDR
BSCU (Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF) and FLDR (Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCU is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2030 Index, while FLDR is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSCU returned 0.39%/yr vs 3.72%/yr for FLDR. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSCU charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLDR.
Performance
BSCU vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCU achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than FLDR's 1.79% return.
BSCU
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- 0.39%
- 10Y*
- —
FLDR
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 4.47%
- 3Y*
- 5.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- —
BSCU vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.04% | 8.24% | 3.12% | 8.66% | -15.08% | -3.02% | 1.43% |
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 1.79% | 5.41% | 5.71% | 6.32% | -0.33% | -0.18% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCU and FLDR is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020 | 0.57 |
The correlation between BSCU and FLDR shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.72 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCU vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank
BSCU
FLDR
BSCU vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSCU | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 2.60 | -1.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 9.60 | -7.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.62 | 65.30 | -59.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSCU vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCU drawdown since its inception was -22.34%, which is greater than FLDR's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCU and FLDR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCU | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.34% | -12.23% | -10.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.07% | -0.47% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.66% | -0.76% | -4.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.74% | -2.33% | -19.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -0.07% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.92% | -0.35% | -7.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 0.07% | +0.58% |
Volatility
BSCU vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) has a higher volatility of 0.95% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) at 0.22%. This indicates that BSCU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCU | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.95% | 0.22% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.21% | 0.61% | +1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96% | 0.80% | +2.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.60% | 1.21% | +5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.43% | 5.23% | +1.20% |
BSCU vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCU has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSCU vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison
BSCU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than FLDR's 4.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.64% | 4.56% | 4.70% | 4.07% | 3.06% | 1.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 4.33% | 4.66% | 5.50% | 5.28% | 2.09% | 0.51% | 1.22% | 2.69% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCU and FLDR have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSCU has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to FLDR (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCU dropped -22.34% vs FLDR's -12.23%.
On 5-year performance, FLDR leads with 3.72% vs 0.39% for BSCU. On fees, BSCU is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, FLDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLDR has performed better with a 3.72% return vs 0.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSCU is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLDR.
BSCU has the higher dividend yield at 4.64%, compared with 4.33% for FLDR.
BSCU is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FLDR is Short-Term Bond. BSCU tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2030 Index, while FLDR tracks Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCU and 0.15% for FLDR.
FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.62 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCU and FLDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer