BSCQ vs. BSCV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) and BSCV (Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds from Invesco - BSCQ tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index while BSCV tracks the Invesco BulletShares Corporate Bond 2031 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSCQ returned 5.06%/yr vs 5.70%/yr for BSCV. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.

Performance

BSCQ vs. BSCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) and Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCQ achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than BSCV's 0.13% return.

BSCQ

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 4.41%
• 3Y*: 5.06%
• 5Y*: 1.47%
• 10Y*: —

BSCV

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 0.13%
• 6M: 0.29%
• 1Y: 5.33%
• 3Y*: 5.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCQ vs. BSCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	1.55%	5.02%	4.86%	5.71%	-8.31%	-1.22%
BSCV Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF	0.13%	9.04%	2.62%	9.16%	-16.90%	-1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCQ and BSCV is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2021	0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between BSCQ and BSCV has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BSCQ vs. BSCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSCQ	BSCV
Financial Services	32.7%	9.2%
Technology	10.8%	13.8%
Healthcare	7.4%	13.1%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	9.4%
Industrials	6.0%	6.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	4.4%
Utilities	3.5%	3.8%
Energy	3.0%	7.3%
Real Estate	2.9%	5.2%
Communication Services	1.5%	8.6%
Basic Materials	0.5%	1.2%

Return for Risk

BSCQ vs. BSCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCQ

BSCQ Risk / Return Rank: 99
BSCQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Martin Ratio Rank: 99

BSCV

BSCV Risk / Return Rank: 45
BSCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
BSCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
BSCV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
BSCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
BSCV Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCQ vs. BSCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) and Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSCQ	BSCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	7.06	1.55	+5.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	15.22	2.38	+12.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.45	1.28	+2.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	43.24	2.17	+41.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	179.65	7.18	+172.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSCQ vs. BSCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCQ Sharpe Ratio is 7.06, which is higher than the BSCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCQ and BSCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSCQ	BSCV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.06	1.55	+5.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	-0.00	+0.60

Drawdowns

BSCQ vs. BSCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCQ drawdown since its inception was -16.50%, smaller than the maximum BSCV drawdown of -23.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCQ and BSCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSCQ	BSCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.50%	-23.28%	+6.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.10%	-2.47%	+2.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.13%	-6.75%	+5.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.19%	+1.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.85%	-9.56%	+6.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	0.74%	-0.72%

Volatility

BSCQ vs. BSCV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) is 0.17%, while Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCV) has a volatility of 1.02%. This indicates that BSCQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSCQ	BSCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.17%	1.02%	-0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.43%	2.44%	-2.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63%	3.44%	-2.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.30%	7.36%	-4.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.77%	7.36%	-2.59%

BSCQ vs. BSCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSCQ and BSCV have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BSCQ vs. BSCV - Dividend Comparison

BSCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than BSCV's 4.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	4.12%	4.14%	4.05%	3.53%	2.54%	1.91%	2.42%	2.96%	3.32%	2.92%	0.51%
BSCV Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF	4.69%	4.65%	4.87%	4.47%	3.43%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSCQ and BSCV in my portfolio?

BSCQ and BSCV have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSCQ or BSCV?

BSCV has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to BSCQ (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCQ dropped -16.50% vs BSCV's -23.28%.

Which ETF is better, BSCQ or BSCV?

On 3-year performance, BSCV leads with 5.70% vs 5.06% for BSCQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, BSCQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSCQ or BSCV?

Over the 3-year period, BSCV has performed better with a 5.70% return vs 5.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSCQ or BSCV?

BSCQ and BSCV have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSCQ or BSCV?

BSCV has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 4.12% for BSCQ.

What is the main difference between BSCQ and BSCV?

BSCQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index, while BSCV tracks Invesco BulletShares Corporate Bond 2031 Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.06 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.