PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCP vs. PZT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCP vs. PZT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP) and Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSCP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PZT

1D
0.34%
1M
2.47%
YTD
3.37%
6M
3.21%
1Y
8.84%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
1.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCP vs. PZT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSCP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF
0.00%4.19%5.06%5.11%-5.99%-1.37%8.10%12.76%-1.90%5.75%
PZT
Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
3.37%1.76%1.17%7.57%-13.04%2.67%5.89%9.52%-0.55%6.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCP and PZT is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2015

0.27

The correlation between BSCP and PZT shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCP vs. PZT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PZT
PZT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PZT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZT Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PZT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZT Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCP vs. PZT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP) and Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSCPPZTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.51

BSCP vs. PZT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSCP vs. PZT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCPPZTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

Volatility

BSCP vs. PZT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCPPZTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.93%

BSCP vs. PZT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCP has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PZT's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSCP vs. PZT - Dividend Comparison

BSCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than PZT's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF
1.92%3.99%3.96%3.39%2.24%1.93%2.42%3.12%3.26%2.93%2.94%0.75%
PZT
Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
3.60%3.43%3.04%2.82%2.66%2.77%2.55%2.73%3.01%2.94%3.36%3.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCP and PZT have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BSCP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSCP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for PZT.

PZT has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 1.92% for BSCP.

BSCP is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while PZT is Municipal Bonds. BSCP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2025 Index, while PZT tracks ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCP and 0.28% for PZT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCP and PZT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer