PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCP vs. IBMQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCP vs. IBMQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP) and iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSCP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBMQ

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.69%
6M
1.27%
1Y
3.49%
3Y*
2.96%
5Y*
0.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCP vs. IBMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BSCP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF
0.00%4.19%5.06%5.11%-5.99%-1.37%8.10%7.08%
IBMQ
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF
0.69%4.09%0.71%4.00%-6.73%-0.26%6.93%5.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCP and IBMQ is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019

0.43

The correlation between BSCP and IBMQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCP vs. IBMQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCP

IBMQ
IBMQ Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IBMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IBMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCP vs. IBMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP) and iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSCP vs. IBMQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCPIBMQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

Drawdowns

BSCP vs. IBMQ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCPIBMQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

Volatility

BSCP vs. IBMQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCPIBMQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.55%

BSCP vs. IBMQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCP has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IBMQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCP vs. IBMQ - Dividend Comparison

BSCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than IBMQ's 2.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF
2.27%3.99%3.96%3.39%2.24%1.93%2.42%3.12%3.26%2.93%2.94%0.75%
IBMQ
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF
2.45%2.43%2.33%1.93%1.25%1.05%1.24%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCP and IBMQ have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BSCP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSCP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IBMQ.

IBMQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 2.27% for BSCP.

BSCP is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IBMQ is Municipal Bonds. BSCP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2025 Index, while IBMQ tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2028 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCP and 0.18% for IBMQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCP and IBMQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer