BSCP vs. FLDR
BSCP (Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF) and FLDR (Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCP is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2025 Index, while FLDR is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSCP charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLDR.
Performance
BSCP vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BSCP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLDR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 4.45%
- 3Y*
- 5.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- —
BSCP vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCP Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 4.19% | 5.06% | 5.11% | -5.99% | -1.37% | 8.10% | 12.76% | 2.03% |
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 1.83% | 5.41% | 5.71% | 6.32% | -0.33% | -0.18% | 2.01% | 4.52% | 0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCP and FLDR is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BSCP and FLDR has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCP vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank
BSCP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLDR
BSCP vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSCP | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.61 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 9.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 64.94 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSCP vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCP | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -12.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.03% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.35% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.07% | — |
Volatility
BSCP vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCP | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.80% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 1.21% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 5.23% | — |
BSCP vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCP has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSCP vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison
BSCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than FLDR's 4.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCP Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.92% | 3.99% | 3.96% | 3.39% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.42% | 3.12% | 3.26% | 2.93% | 2.94% | 0.75% |
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 4.33% | 4.66% | 5.50% | 5.28% | 2.09% | 0.51% | 1.22% | 2.69% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCP and FLDR have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSCP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLDR.
FLDR has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 1.92% for BSCP.
BSCP is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FLDR is Short-Term Bond. BSCP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2025 Index, while FLDR tracks Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCP and 0.15% for FLDR.
Find the right allocation for BSCP and FLDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer