BSCMX vs. JASCX
BSCMX (Brandes Small Cap Value Fund) and JASCX (James Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, BSCMX returned 15.20%/yr vs 12.84%/yr for JASCX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BSCMX charges 0.91%/yr vs 1.56%/yr for JASCX.
Performance
BSCMX vs. JASCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BSCMX having a 14.47% return and JASCX slightly higher at 14.61%.
BSCMX
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- YTD
- 14.47%
- 6M
- 16.11%
- 1Y
- 40.15%
- 3Y*
- 25.02%
- 5Y*
- 15.20%
- 10Y*
- —
JASCX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 14.61%
- 6M
- 14.01%
- 1Y
- 30.58%
- 3Y*
- 21.73%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
BSCMX vs. JASCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 14.47% | 23.51% | 24.77% | 22.75% | -7.89% | 27.61% | 20.38% | 12.82% | -12.23% |
JASCX James Small Cap Fund | 14.61% | 12.66% | 18.11% | 25.15% | -11.68% | 38.79% | -1.12% | 17.82% | -26.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCMX and JASCX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2018 | 0.86 |
The correlation between BSCMX and JASCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCMX vs. JASCX — Risk / Return Rank
BSCMX
JASCX
BSCMX vs. JASCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) and James Small Cap Fund (JASCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCMX | JASCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.34 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | 3.33 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.24 | 10.18 | +4.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCMX | JASCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 1.94 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.68 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.41 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
BSCMX vs. JASCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCMX drawdown since its inception was -38.12%, smaller than the maximum JASCX drawdown of -59.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCMX and JASCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCMX | JASCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.12% | -59.21% | +21.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.65% | -9.09% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.34% | -19.78% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.34% | -22.24% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.30% | -0.52% | -1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.03% | -10.73% | +4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 2.97% | -0.13% |
Volatility
BSCMX vs. JASCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) is 4.58%, while James Small Cap Fund (JASCX) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that BSCMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JASCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCMX | JASCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 5.15% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 11.46% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.38% | 15.64% | +1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 18.89% | -0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 21.13% | -0.53% |
BSCMX vs. JASCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCMX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than JASCX's 1.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSCMX vs. JASCX - Dividend Comparison
BSCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than JASCX's 2.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 3.97% | 4.54% | 2.31% | 3.50% | 2.93% | 4.38% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 9.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JASCX James Small Cap Fund | 2.95% | 3.39% | 6.62% | 0.58% | 6.51% | 0.28% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 10.24% | 24.98% | 0.48% | 4.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCMX and JASCX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JASCX has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to BSCMX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCMX dropped -38.12% vs JASCX's -59.21%.
BSCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCMX and JASCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer