BSCMX vs. HWSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX).
BSCMX is managed by Brandes. It was launched on Jan 2, 2018. HWSAX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jun 10, 2000.
Performance
BSCMX vs. HWSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSCMX vs. HWSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 8.18% | 23.51% | 24.77% | 22.75% | -7.89% | 27.61% | 20.38% | 12.82% | -12.23% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 9.00% | 1.38% | 4.77% | 18.56% | 2.81% | 35.32% | -0.50% | 20.26% | -16.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCMX achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly lower than HWSAX's 9.00% return.
BSCMX
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -7.43%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 13.76%
- 1Y
- 42.61%
- 3Y*
- 23.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.29%
- 10Y*
- —
HWSAX
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- 1Y
- 18.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSCMX vs. HWSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCMX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than HWSAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BSCMX vs. HWSAX — Risk / Return Rank
BSCMX
HWSAX
BSCMX vs. HWSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCMX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.96 | 0.78 | +1.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.74 | 1.22 | +1.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.17 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 1.17 | +1.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.65 | 4.34 | +8.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCMX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 0.78 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.42 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.47 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCMX and HWSAX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BSCMX vs. HWSAX - Dividend Comparison
BSCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than HWSAX's 0.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 4.20% | 4.54% | 2.31% | 3.50% | 2.93% | 4.38% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 9.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 0.64% | 0.69% | 8.19% | 1.79% | 13.39% | 0.22% | 0.63% | 4.62% | 9.45% | 4.80% | 0.00% | 11.67% |
Drawdowns
BSCMX vs. HWSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCMX drawdown since its inception was -38.12%, smaller than the maximum HWSAX drawdown of -72.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCMX and HWSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCMX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.12% | -72.14% | +34.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.85% | -16.44% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.34% | -26.98% | +4.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.43% | -1.09% | -6.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.10% | -11.03% | +4.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 4.43% | -1.08% |
Volatility
BSCMX vs. HWSAX - Volatility Comparison
Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) at 4.45%. This indicates that BSCMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSCMX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.72% | 4.45% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | 12.99% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.03% | 23.99% | -1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 21.71% | -3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 24.65% | -3.96% |