BSCMX vs. BISMX
BSCMX (Brandes Small Cap Value Fund) and BISMX (Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - BSCMX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Brandes, while BISMX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Brandes. Over the past 5 years, BSCMX returned 15.98%/yr vs 16.55%/yr for BISMX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSCMX charges 0.91%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for BISMX.
Performance
BSCMX vs. BISMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCMX achieves a 17.47% return, which is significantly higher than BISMX's -2.29% return.
BSCMX
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 17.47%
- 6M
- 15.36%
- 1Y
- 42.48%
- 3Y*
- 26.52%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- —
BISMX
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- -2.29%
- 6M
- -2.22%
- 1Y
- 9.44%
- 3Y*
- 27.96%
- 5Y*
- 16.55%
- 10Y*
- 11.19%
BSCMX vs. BISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 17.47% | 23.51% | 24.77% | 22.75% | -7.89% | 27.61% | 20.38% | 12.82% | -12.23% |
BISMX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I | -2.29% | 45.81% | 23.44% | 39.27% | -8.48% | 18.58% | 4.85% | 7.16% | -21.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCMX and BISMX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2018 | 0.66 |
The correlation between BSCMX and BISMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCMX vs. BISMX — Risk / Return Rank
BSCMX
BISMX
BSCMX vs. BISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I (BISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSCMX | BISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.15 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.55 | 0.86 | +3.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.61 | 2.30 | +13.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSCMX vs. BISMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCMX drawdown since its inception was -38.12%, smaller than the maximum BISMX drawdown of -47.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCMX and BISMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCMX | BISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.12% | -47.07% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.65% | -11.61% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.34% | -11.61% | -10.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.34% | -31.26% | +8.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | -10.35% | +8.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.00% | -7.93% | +1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 4.36% | -1.55% |
Volatility
BSCMX vs. BISMX - Volatility Comparison
Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I (BISMX) at 3.55%. This indicates that BSCMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCMX | BISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 3.55% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.84% | 10.41% | +1.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.45% | 12.57% | +4.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.93% | 13.90% | +4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.58% | 14.24% | +6.34% |
BSCMX vs. BISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCMX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than BISMX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSCMX vs. BISMX - Dividend Comparison
BSCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than BISMX's 3.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BISMX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I | 3.41% | 3.34% | 3.22% | 2.93% | 4.16% | 3.45% | 0.92% | 0.82% | 4.10% | 8.51% | 4.16% | 3.65% |
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 3.87% | 4.54% | 2.31% | 3.50% | 2.93% | 4.38% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 9.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCMX and BISMX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSCMX has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to BISMX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCMX dropped -38.12% vs BISMX's -47.07%.
BSCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCMX and BISMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer