PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCFX vs. UMBHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCFX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Small Cap Fund (BSCFX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSCFX

1D
-1.03%
1M
3.00%
YTD
-1.94%
6M
-2.17%
1Y
-0.10%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
1.04%
10Y*
10.21%

UMBHX

1D
-1.21%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCFX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BSCFX and UMBHX is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

-1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCFX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCFX
BSCFX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BSCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

UMBHX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCFX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Small Cap Fund (BSCFX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSCFXUMBHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.23

BSCFX vs. UMBHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCFXUMBHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

-20.59

+21.01

Drawdowns

BSCFX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCFX drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCFX and UMBHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCFXUMBHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.59%

-1.86%

-53.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.02%

-1.86%

-9.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.08%

-1.26%

-9.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

Volatility

BSCFX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCFXUMBHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.67%

6.22%

+11.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.33%

6.22%

+16.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.37%

6.22%

+16.15%

BSCFX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCFX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSCFX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison

BSCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.69%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCFX
Baron Small Cap Fund
9.69%9.50%13.96%3.04%5.90%12.47%11.17%9.60%10.91%13.57%22.41%12.56%
UMBHX
Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCFX and UMBHX have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCFX and UMBHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer