BSCFX vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about Baron Small Cap Fund (BSCFX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
BSCFX is managed by Baron Capital Group, Inc.. It was launched on Sep 30, 1997. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000.
Performance
BSCFX vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSCFX vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCFX Baron Small Cap Fund | -10.87% | -0.92% | 13.11% | 26.90% | -31.19% | 15.42% | 40.38% | 34.60% | -7.39% | 27.34% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.93% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCFX achieves a -10.87% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 0.93% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BSCFX having a 9.67% annualized return and IWM not far ahead at 9.76%.
BSCFX
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -9.81%
- YTD
- -10.87%
- 6M
- -12.33%
- 1Y
- -2.85%
- 3Y*
- 5.04%
- 5Y*
- -0.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
IWM
- 1D
- 3.50%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 25.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSCFX vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCFX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BSCFX vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
BSCFX
IWM
BSCFX vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Small Cap Fund (BSCFX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCFX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | 1.11 | -1.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | 1.66 | -1.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.21 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 1.82 | -2.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 6.76 | -7.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCFX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | 1.11 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.15 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.43 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.34 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCFX and IWM is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BSCFX vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
BSCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.66%, more than IWM's 1.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCFX Baron Small Cap Fund | 10.66% | 9.50% | 13.96% | 3.04% | 5.90% | 12.47% | 11.17% | 9.60% | 10.91% | 13.57% | 22.41% | 12.56% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.02% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
BSCFX vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCFX drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCFX and IWM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCFX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.59% | -59.05% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.00% | -13.74% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.94% | -31.91% | -6.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.58% | -41.13% | +1.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.12% | -7.91% | -11.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.07% | -10.83% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.87% | 3.70% | +1.17% |
Volatility
BSCFX vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baron Small Cap Fund (BSCFX) is 5.53%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 7.47%. This indicates that BSCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSCFX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 7.47% | -1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.03% | 14.47% | -1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.27% | 23.18% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 22.55% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 22.99% | -0.68% |