BSCFX vs. ETEGX
BSCFX (Baron Small Cap Fund) and ETEGX (Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BSCFX returned 10.51%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for ETEGX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BSCFX charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for ETEGX.
Performance
BSCFX vs. ETEGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCFX achieves a -1.76% return, which is significantly lower than ETEGX's 7.19% return. Over the past 10 years, BSCFX has outperformed ETEGX with an annualized return of 10.51%, while ETEGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.20% annualized return.
BSCFX
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- -1.76%
- 6M
- -3.73%
- 1Y
- -0.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
ETEGX
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 4.68%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 6.92%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
BSCFX vs. ETEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCFX Baron Small Cap Fund | -1.76% | -0.92% | 13.11% | 26.90% | -31.19% | 15.42% | 40.38% | 34.60% | -7.39% | 27.34% |
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | 7.19% | -6.20% | 14.65% | 11.28% | -15.52% | 21.45% | 12.73% | 27.57% | -6.00% | 14.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCFX and ETEGX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1997 | 0.86 |
The correlation between BSCFX and ETEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCFX vs. ETEGX — Risk / Return Rank
BSCFX
ETEGX
BSCFX vs. ETEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Small Cap Fund (BSCFX) and Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSCFX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.04 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 0.23 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | 0.51 | -0.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSCFX vs. ETEGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCFX drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, smaller than the maximum ETEGX drawdown of -67.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCFX and ETEGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCFX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.59% | -67.58% | +11.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.00% | -13.05% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.91% | -19.98% | -6.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.94% | -24.30% | -13.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.58% | -36.66% | -2.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.85% | -5.35% | -5.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.08% | -22.73% | +11.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.93% | 5.90% | +0.03% |
Volatility
BSCFX vs. ETEGX - Volatility Comparison
Baron Small Cap Fund (BSCFX) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) at 4.79%. This indicates that BSCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCFX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 4.79% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.39% | 11.53% | +1.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.94% | 16.27% | +1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.39% | 18.80% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 19.84% | +2.53% |
BSCFX vs. ETEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCFX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ETEGX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSCFX vs. ETEGX - Dividend Comparison
BSCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.67%, more than ETEGX's 7.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCFX Baron Small Cap Fund | 9.67% | 9.50% | 13.96% | 3.04% | 5.90% | 12.47% | 11.17% | 9.60% | 10.91% | 13.57% | 22.41% | 12.56% |
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | 7.68% | 8.23% | 5.13% | 0.68% | 3.22% | 13.87% | 1.06% | 7.19% | 12.29% | 11.02% | 13.88% | 23.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCFX and ETEGX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSCFX has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to ETEGX (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCFX dropped -55.59% vs ETEGX's -67.58%.
ETEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCFX and ETEGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer