BRXAX vs. FHKCX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Blended Research International Equity Fund Class A (BRXAX) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX).

BRXAX is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World (ex-US) Index (net div). It was launched on Sep 15, 2015. FHKCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 1995.

Performance

BRXAX vs. FHKCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Blended Research International Equity Fund Class A (BRXAX) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BRXAX vs. FHKCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BRXAX MFS Blended Research International Equity Fund Class A	-0.91%	39.54%	11.62%	14.03%	-13.57%	13.21%	8.90%	21.79%	-15.77%	24.93%
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund	5.51%	42.56%	23.15%	-0.29%	-23.87%	-13.69%	47.85%	35.12%	-17.43%	51.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRXAX achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly lower than FHKCX's 5.51% return. Over the past 10 years, BRXAX has underperformed FHKCX with an annualized return of 9.72%, while FHKCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.16% annualized return.

BRXAX

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -11.05%
• YTD: -0.91%
• 6M: 6.47%
• 1Y: 29.84%
• 3Y*: 18.18%
• 5Y*: 10.14%
• 10Y*: 9.72%

FHKCX

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -9.04%
• YTD: 5.51%
• 6M: 6.28%
• 1Y: 43.83%
• 3Y*: 19.86%
• 5Y*: 2.80%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRXAX vs. FHKCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRXAX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than FHKCX's 0.91% expense ratio.

FHKCX

Fidelity China Region Fund

BRXAX

MFS Blended Research International Equity Fund Class A

Return for Risk

BRXAX vs. FHKCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRXAX

BRXAX Risk / Return Rank: 89
BRXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BRXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
BRXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BRXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
BRXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FHKCX

FHKCX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FHKCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FHKCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FHKCX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FHKCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FHKCX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRXAX vs. FHKCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research International Equity Fund Class A (BRXAX) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BRXAX	FHKCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	1.87	+0.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	2.41	+0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.35	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	2.51	-0.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.64	9.74	-0.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BRXAX vs. FHKCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRXAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the FHKCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRXAX and FHKCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BRXAX	FHKCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	1.87	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.12	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.55	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.40	+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between BRXAX and FHKCX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BRXAX vs. FHKCX - Dividend Comparison

BRXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than FHKCX's 1.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BRXAX MFS Blended Research International Equity Fund Class A	4.05%	4.02%	4.63%	2.53%	2.52%	5.21%	2.13%	2.66%	6.55%	1.13%	0.40%	1.18%
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund	1.66%	1.75%	1.39%	1.92%	1.05%	10.77%	4.85%	0.66%	0.83%	0.39%	1.35%	15.47%

Drawdowns

BRXAX vs. FHKCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRXAX drawdown since its inception was -36.59%, smaller than the maximum FHKCX drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRXAX and FHKCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRXAX	FHKCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.59%	-61.96%	+25.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.23%	-15.94%	+4.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.63%	-53.82%	+27.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.59%	-58.41%	+21.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.23%	-10.80%	-0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.07%	-20.37%	+13.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	4.12%	-1.29%

Volatility

BRXAX vs. FHKCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Blended Research International Equity Fund Class A (BRXAX) is 6.34%, while Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) has a volatility of 9.27%. This indicates that BRXAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHKCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRXAX	FHKCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.34%	9.27%	-2.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.04%	16.45%	-6.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.70%	23.16%	-8.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.40%	23.97%	-9.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.72%	22.10%	-6.38%