PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRUSX vs. HWSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRUSX vs. HWSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund (BRUSX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRUSX achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly lower than HWSIX's 25.58% return. Over the past 10 years, BRUSX has underperformed HWSIX with an annualized return of 9.29%, while HWSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.42% annualized return.


BRUSX

1D
-0.03%
1M
-2.66%
6M
4.28%
YTD
9.32%
1Y
25.93%
3Y*
13.18%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*
9.29%
ALL TIME*
11.63%

HWSIX

1D
-0.33%
1M
6.58%
6M
16.88%
YTD
25.58%
1Y
32.20%
3Y*
12.09%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
11.42%
ALL TIME*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BRUSX vs. HWSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRUSX
Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund
9.32%7.13%17.57%18.14%-10.99%13.85%33.43%9.52%-15.77%3.86%
HWSIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund
25.58%1.60%5.00%18.85%2.97%35.54%-0.31%20.54%-15.03%7.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BRUSX and HWSIX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 1994

0.75

The correlation between BRUSX and HWSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRUSX vs. HWSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BRUSX
BRUSX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BRUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BRUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

HWSIX
HWSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
HWSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
HWSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BRUSX vs. HWSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund (BRUSX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRUSXHWSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.31

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

2.85

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.92

9.66

-4.74

BRUSX vs. HWSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the HWSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRUSX and HWSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRUSX vs. HWSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRUSX drawdown since its inception was -60.38%, smaller than the maximum HWSIX drawdown of -72.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRUSX and HWSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRUSXHWSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.38%

-72.00%

+11.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.87%

-10.01%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.73%

-26.92%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.95%

-26.92%

-12.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.77%

-53.67%

-2.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.08%

-0.55%

-3.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.49%

-12.03%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

2.96%

+1.47%

Volatility

BRUSX vs. HWSIX - Volatility Comparison

Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund (BRUSX) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) at 2.94%. This indicates that BRUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRUSXHWSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

2.94%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.67%

10.45%

+4.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.36%

16.48%

+4.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.19%

21.21%

+1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.35%

24.51%

-1.16%

BRUSX vs. HWSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRUSX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than HWSIX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRUSX vs. HWSIX - Dividend Comparison

BRUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.66%, more than HWSIX's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRUSX
Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund
9.66%10.56%2.46%4.97%18.41%7.70%1.53%1.14%13.87%1.99%1.12%1.03%
HWSIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund
0.80%1.01%8.35%1.90%13.44%0.36%0.80%4.89%9.84%5.07%0.41%11.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRUSX and HWSIX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRUSX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to HWSIX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRUSX dropped -60.38% vs HWSIX's -72.00%.

HWSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRUSX and HWSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer