PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRTR vs. FIGB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRTR vs. FIGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) and Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRTR achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly higher than FIGB's 0.14% return.


BRTR

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.46%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.28%
1Y
5.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FIGB

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.14%
6M
0.08%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRTR vs. FIGB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BRTR
Blackrock Total Return ETF
0.40%8.11%1.29%0.43%
FIGB
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF
0.14%6.95%1.51%-0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between BRTR and FIGB is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023

0.83

The correlation between BRTR and FIGB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRTR vs. FIGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRTR
BRTR Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
BRTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BRTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRTR Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FIGB
FIGB Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FIGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIGB Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FIGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIGB Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRTR vs. FIGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) and Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRTRFIGBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.63

1.19

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.38

1.75

+0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.21

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.69

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.57

5.25

+0.32

BRTR vs. FIGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the FIGB Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRTR and FIGB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRTRFIGBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

1.19

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.07

+0.81

Drawdowns

BRTR vs. FIGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRTR drawdown since its inception was -5.07%, smaller than the maximum FIGB drawdown of -18.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRTR and FIGB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRTRFIGBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-18.08%

+13.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

-2.93%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-1.60%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.35%

-6.92%

+5.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

0.94%

+0.14%

Volatility

BRTR vs. FIGB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) is 1.28%, while Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that BRTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRTRFIGBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

1.42%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.77%

2.87%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.68%

4.16%

-0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.69%

6.28%

-1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.69%

6.17%

-1.48%

BRTR vs. FIGB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRTR has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FIGB's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRTR vs. FIGB - Dividend Comparison

BRTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than FIGB's 4.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BRTR
Blackrock Total Return ETF
4.73%4.86%5.58%0.22%0.00%0.00%
FIGB
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF
4.11%4.15%4.28%3.79%2.44%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRTR and FIGB have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIGB has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to BRTR (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRTR dropped -5.07% vs FIGB's -18.08%.

On 1-year performance, BRTR leads with 5.97% vs 4.93% for FIGB. On fees, FIGB is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, BRTR has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BRTR has performed better with a 5.97% return vs 4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIGB is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for BRTR.

BRTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 4.11% for FIGB.

BRTR is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while FIGB is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for BRTR and 0.36% for FIGB.

BRTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRTR and FIGB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer