PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRSVX vs. WAMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRSVX vs. WAMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridgeway Small Cap Value Fund (BRSVX) and Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund (WAMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRSVX achieves a 20.69% return, which is significantly higher than WAMVX's 15.09% return. Over the past 10 years, BRSVX has underperformed WAMVX with an annualized return of 12.06%, while WAMVX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.85% annualized return.


BRSVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.84%
6M
13.88%
YTD
20.69%
1Y
37.27%
3Y*
9.27%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
12.06%
ALL TIME*
9.16%

WAMVX

1D
0.64%
1M
-5.40%
6M
9.24%
YTD
15.09%
1Y
28.57%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
13.85%
ALL TIME*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BRSVX vs. WAMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRSVX
Bridgeway Small Cap Value Fund
20.69%5.51%-0.22%14.20%-7.76%67.87%12.04%15.00%-13.09%7.09%
WAMVX
Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund
15.09%9.31%24.40%13.13%-28.95%26.17%41.10%29.93%-8.88%26.47%

Correlation

The correlation between BRSVX and WAMVX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2003

0.84

The correlation between BRSVX and WAMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRSVX vs. WAMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BRSVX
BRSVX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BRSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BRSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

WAMVX
WAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
WAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
WAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BRSVX vs. WAMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgeway Small Cap Value Fund (BRSVX) and Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund (WAMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRSVXWAMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.23

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

1.94

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.44

6.04

+5.40

BRSVX vs. WAMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRSVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the WAMVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRSVX and WAMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRSVX vs. WAMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRSVX drawdown since its inception was -67.58%, which is greater than WAMVX's maximum drawdown of -60.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRSVX and WAMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRSVXWAMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.58%

-60.71%

-6.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-13.33%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.52%

-23.66%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.52%

-38.69%

+8.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.67%

-41.30%

-10.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-7.80%

+6.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.56%

-10.19%

-3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

4.28%

-1.34%

Volatility

BRSVX vs. WAMVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bridgeway Small Cap Value Fund (BRSVX) is 3.43%, while Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund (WAMVX) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that BRSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WAMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRSVXWAMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

5.16%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.74%

14.88%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.92%

19.73%

-1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.86%

20.73%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.18%

21.39%

+2.79%

BRSVX vs. WAMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRSVX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than WAMVX's 1.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRSVX vs. WAMVX - Dividend Comparison

BRSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, less than WAMVX's 9.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRSVX
Bridgeway Small Cap Value Fund
6.81%2.10%3.35%2.64%0.96%4.55%0.84%2.38%21.58%0.87%0.97%1.96%
WAMVX
Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund
9.73%11.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%22.38%13.06%9.03%13.59%7.98%1.67%12.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRSVX and WAMVX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WAMVX has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to BRSVX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRSVX dropped -67.58% vs WAMVX's -60.71%.

BRSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRSVX and WAMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer