BRSM vs. VFMO
BRSM (MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF) and VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BRSM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by MFS, while VFMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Vanguard. Both are actively managed. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BRSM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMO.
Performance
BRSM vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BRSM
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
VFMO
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- 6M
- 10.10%
- YTD
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 28.79%
- 3Y*
- 23.05%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $230.40K | $287.28K | $868.97K | |
| $13.01M | $17.98M | $16.40M |
BRSM vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BRSM MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF | 2.26% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | -4.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRSM and VFMO is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRSM vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank
BRSM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VFMO
BRSM vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF (BRSM) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRSM | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.63 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRSM vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRSM drawdown since its inception was -3.25%, smaller than the maximum VFMO drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRSM and VFMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRSM | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -36.77% | +33.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -9.35% | +7.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.29% | -7.70% | +6.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.47% | — |
Volatility
BRSM vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRSM | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.98% | 23.43% | -6.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 21.99% | -5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 23.68% | -6.70% |
BRSM vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRSM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRSM vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison
BRSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRSM MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.62% | 0.82% | 0.72% | 0.89% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 1.22% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRSM and VFMO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for BRSM.
VFMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for BRSM.
BRSM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VFMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: MFS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for BRSM and 0.13% for VFMO.
Find the right allocation for BRSM and VFMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer