BRSM vs. SRHQ
BRSM (MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF) and SRHQ (SRH U.S. Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BRSM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by MFS, while SRHQ is a Quality Factor fund tracking the SRH US Quality Index - Benchmark TR Gross. BRSM is actively managed, while SRHQ is passively managed. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BRSM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SRHQ.
Performance
BRSM vs. SRHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BRSM
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SRHQ
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- 6M
- 16.45%
- YTD
- 20.56%
- 1Y
- 26.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $230.40K | $287.28K | $868.97K | |
| $5.97K | $12.61K | $13.60K |
BRSM vs. SRHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BRSM MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF | 2.26% |
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF | 7.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRSM and SRHQ is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRSM vs. SRHQ — Risk / Return Rank
BRSM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SRHQ
BRSM vs. SRHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF (BRSM) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRSM | SRHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.21 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.90 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRSM vs. SRHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRSM drawdown since its inception was -3.25%, smaller than the maximum SRHQ drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRSM and SRHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRSM | SRHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -18.50% | +15.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -0.08% | -1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.29% | -2.99% | +1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.78% | — |
Volatility
BRSM vs. SRHQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRSM | SRHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.98% | 14.82% | +2.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 15.96% | +1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 15.96% | +1.02% |
BRSM vs. SRHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRSM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SRHQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRSM vs. SRHQ - Dividend Comparison
BRSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SRHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRSM MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF | 0.69% | 0.76% | 0.66% | 0.84% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRSM and SRHQ have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SRHQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SRHQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for BRSM.
SRHQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.00% for BRSM.
BRSM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SRHQ is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: MFS and SRH. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for BRSM and 0.35% for SRHQ.
Find the right allocation for BRSM and SRHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer