PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRSJX vs. AUERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRSJX vs. AUERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Blended Research Small Cap Equity Fund (BRSJX) and Auer Growth Fund (AUERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BRSJX having a 14.92% return and AUERX slightly lower at 14.41%. Over the past 10 years, BRSJX has underperformed AUERX with an annualized return of 9.64%, while AUERX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.13% annualized return.


BRSJX

1D
1.80%
1M
2.48%
YTD
14.92%
6M
11.81%
1Y
31.10%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*
9.64%

AUERX

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.64%
YTD
14.41%
6M
12.47%
1Y
43.06%
3Y*
25.23%
5Y*
20.95%
10Y*
16.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRSJX vs. AUERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRSJX
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Equity Fund
14.92%5.80%4.75%18.84%-18.40%28.88%2.09%26.23%-5.37%13.22%
AUERX
Auer Growth Fund
14.41%30.10%11.12%21.42%9.95%45.11%-1.85%27.96%-25.63%28.75%

Correlation

The correlation between BRSJX and AUERX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.85

The correlation between BRSJX and AUERX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRSJX vs. AUERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRSJX
BRSJX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BRSJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRSJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRSJX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BRSJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRSJX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

AUERX
AUERX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
AUERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUERX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AUERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUERX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRSJX vs. AUERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Small Cap Equity Fund (BRSJX) and Auer Growth Fund (AUERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRSJXAUERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.44

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

4.22

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.80

17.70

-7.90

BRSJX vs. AUERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRSJX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the AUERX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRSJX and AUERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRSJX vs. AUERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRSJX drawdown since its inception was -45.20%, smaller than the maximum AUERX drawdown of -67.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRSJX and AUERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRSJXAUERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.20%

-67.23%

+22.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.37%

-10.06%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.05%

-34.80%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.05%

-34.80%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.20%

-51.89%

+6.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-2.62%

+2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-24.82%

+16.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.39%

+0.77%

Volatility

BRSJX vs. AUERX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Blended Research Small Cap Equity Fund (BRSJX) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to Auer Growth Fund (AUERX) at 5.85%. This indicates that BRSJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRSJXAUERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

5.85%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.32%

12.19%

+2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.07%

16.57%

+2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.29%

24.86%

-2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.09%

24.40%

-1.31%

BRSJX vs. AUERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRSJX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than AUERX's 2.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRSJX vs. AUERX - Dividend Comparison

BRSJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, less than AUERX's 9.95% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AUERX
Auer Growth Fund
9.95%11.39%24.55%4.54%5.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BRSJX
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Equity Fund
5.84%6.71%7.66%0.78%4.18%12.97%0.67%1.83%6.23%3.01%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRSJX and AUERX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRSJX has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to AUERX (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRSJX dropped -45.20% vs AUERX's -67.23%.

AUERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRSJX and AUERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer