PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRP vs. ATRL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BRP vs. ATRL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BRP Group, Inc. (BRP) and SNC-Lavalin Group Inc (ATRL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BRP is traded in USD, while ATRL.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ATRL.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRP achieves a 15.44% return, which is significantly higher than ATRL.TO's -4.10% return.


BRP

1D
3.93%
1M
-2.36%
6M
26.55%
YTD
15.44%
1Y
-21.44%
3Y*
3.28%
5Y*
0.35%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.15%

ATRL.TO

1D
1.55%
1M
0.59%
6M
-12.40%
YTD
-4.10%
1Y
-11.42%
3Y*
28.99%
5Y*
18.60%
10Y*
4.65%
ALL TIME*
5.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$30.36M$27.99M$37.64M
$35.01M$33.29M$37.18M

BRP vs. ATRL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BRP
BRP Group, Inc.
15.44%-38.00%61.37%-4.46%-30.38%20.49%86.73%-7.65%
ATRL.TO
SNC-Lavalin Group Inc
-4.10%21.85%65.04%83.55%-27.19%42.67%-25.42%44.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BRP and ATRL.TO is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2019

0.20

The correlation between BRP and ATRL.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BRP:

$2.16B

ATRL.TO:

CA$14.13B

EPS

BRP:

-$0.99

ATRL.TO:

CA$16.04

PS Ratio

BRP:

1.31

ATRL.TO:

1.26

PB Ratio

BRP:

2.93

ATRL.TO:

2.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

BRP:

$1.74B

ATRL.TO:

CA$11.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BRP:

$0.00

ATRL.TO:

CA$884.72M

EBITDA (TTM)

BRP:

-$41.30M

ATRL.TO:

CA$3.55B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRP vs. ATRL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BRP
BRP Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRP Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
BRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRP Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

ATRL.TO
ATRL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
ATRL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATRL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATRL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
ATRL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATRL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BRP vs. ATRL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BRP Group, Inc. (BRP) and SNC-Lavalin Group Inc (ATRL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRPATRL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

0.97

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

-0.47

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.72

-0.85

+0.12

BRP vs. ATRL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRP Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is comparable to the ATRL.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRP and ATRL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRP vs. ATRL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRP drawdown since its inception was -70.16%, smaller than the maximum ATRL.TO drawdown of -77.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRP and ATRL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRPATRL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.16%

-77.90%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.74%

-26.70%

-28.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.16%

-26.70%

-43.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.16%

-46.79%

-23.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.83%

-20.58%

-29.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.92%

-31.71%

+2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.81%

14.84%

+19.97%

Volatility

BRP vs. ATRL.TO - Volatility Comparison

BRP Group, Inc. (BRP) has a higher volatility of 16.32% compared to SNC-Lavalin Group Inc (ATRL.TO) at 8.57%. This indicates that BRP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATRL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRPATRL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.32%

8.57%

+7.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.32%

28.27%

+21.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.41%

36.22%

+28.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.15%

34.38%

+18.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.01%

38.68%

+15.33%

Dividends

BRP vs. ATRL.TO - Dividend Comparison

BRP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ATRL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATRL.TO
SNC-Lavalin Group Inc
0.09%0.09%0.10%0.19%0.34%0.26%0.37%0.80%2.50%1.91%1.80%2.43%
BRP
BRP Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BRP vs. ATRL.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BRP Group, Inc. and SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. BRP values in USD, ATRL.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


BRP and ATRL.TO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRP and ATRL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer