PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRO vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BRO vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRO achieves a -26.85% return, which is significantly lower than T's -7.40% return. Over the past 10 years, BRO has outperformed T with an annualized return of 13.27%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.86% annualized return.


BRO

1D
-1.46%
1M
3.05%
YTD
-26.85%
6M
-24.91%
1Y
-47.08%
3Y*
-2.56%
5Y*
3.04%
10Y*
13.27%

T

1D
-1.10%
1M
-10.57%
YTD
-7.40%
6M
-7.40%
1Y
-16.38%
3Y*
18.39%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
2.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRO vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRO
Brown & Brown, Inc.
-26.85%-21.37%44.32%25.73%-18.39%49.31%21.06%44.67%8.30%16.15%
T
AT&T Inc.
-7.40%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BRO and T is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 1992

0.23

The correlation between BRO and T shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

BRO:

$4.76

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

BRO:

12.18

T:

7.39

PEG Ratio

BRO:

0.89

T:

0.31

PS Ratio

BRO:

2.18

T:

1.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

BRO:

$6.43B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BRO:

$3.82B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

BRO:

$1.51B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRO vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRO
BRO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRO Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRO Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRO vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BROTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.69

0.89

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

-0.75

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.59

-1.59

-0.01

BRO vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRO Sharpe Ratio is -1.66, which is lower than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRO and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BROTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.66

-0.75

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.28

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.12

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.38

+0.13

Drawdowns

BRO vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, smaller than the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRO and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BROTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.85%

-64.15%

+8.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.55%

-21.87%

-28.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.85%

-21.87%

-33.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.85%

-32.01%

-23.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.85%

-42.35%

-13.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.91%

-21.87%

-31.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.52%

-15.72%

+2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.57%

10.34%

+19.23%

Volatility

BRO vs. T - Volatility Comparison

Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) has a higher volatility of 9.52% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 7.50%. This indicates that BRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BROTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.52%

7.50%

+2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.90%

17.57%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.53%

21.98%

+6.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.81%

23.97%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.69%

23.71%

-0.02%

Dividends

BRO vs. T - Dividend Comparison

BRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than T's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRO
Brown & Brown, Inc.
1.11%0.77%0.53%0.67%0.74%0.54%0.73%0.82%1.11%1.08%1.12%1.41%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.93%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

BRO vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brown & Brown, Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
1.90B
33.47B
(BRO) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BRO and T have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRO has higher volatility (9.52%) compared to T (7.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRO dropped -55.85% vs T's -64.15%.

T currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.75 vs -1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRO and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer