BRNY vs. ABCS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY) and Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS).

BRNY and ABCS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BRNY is an actively managed fund by Alpha Architect. It was launched on Oct 13, 2022. ABCS is a passively managed fund by Alpha Architect that tracks the performance of the BNY Mellon ABC Index. It was launched on Dec 18, 2023.

Performance

BRNY vs. ABCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY) and Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BRNY vs. ABCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BRNY Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF	-2.29%	22.02%	28.84%	1.96%
ABCS Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF	-1.51%	7.95%	14.47%	1.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRNY achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than ABCS's -1.51% return.

BRNY

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: -1.71%
• YTD: -2.29%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: 22.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ABCS

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -4.65%
• YTD: -1.51%
• 6M: -0.34%
• 1Y: 9.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRNY vs. ABCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRNY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ABCS's 0.27% expense ratio.

BRNY

Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF

ABCS

Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF

Return for Risk

BRNY vs. ABCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRNY

BRNY Risk / Return Rank: 70
BRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
BRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 69
BRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
BRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 73

ABCS

ABCS Risk / Return Rank: 27
ABCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
ABCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
ABCS Omega Ratio Rank: 26
ABCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
ABCS Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRNY vs. ABCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY) and Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BRNY	ABCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	0.50	+0.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	0.85	+0.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.11	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	0.72	+1.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.13	2.75	+5.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BRNY vs. ABCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the ABCS Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRNY and ABCS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BRNY	ABCS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	0.50	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.36	0.57	+0.78

Correlation

The correlation between BRNY and ABCS is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BRNY vs. ABCS - Dividend Comparison

BRNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than ABCS's 1.36% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BRNY Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF	0.38%	0.30%	0.23%	0.68%	0.22%
ABCS Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF	1.36%	1.37%	1.39%	0.02%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BRNY vs. ABCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRNY drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, smaller than the maximum ABCS drawdown of -20.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRNY and ABCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRNY	ABCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.14%	-20.52%	+1.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.74%	-13.40%	+1.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.18%	-5.96%	+0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-3.71%	+0.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	3.50%	-0.57%

Volatility

BRNY vs. ABCS - Volatility Comparison

Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) at 4.55%. This indicates that BRNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRNY	ABCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.55%	4.55%	+1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.91%	10.36%	+0.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.99%	19.24%	-0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.06%	17.48%	-0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.06%	17.48%	-0.42%