PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRNT.L vs. SRUUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRNT.L vs. SRUUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Brent Crude Oil (BRNT.L) and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRNT.L achieves a 80.13% return, which is significantly higher than SRUUF's -2.76% return.


BRNT.L

1D
-2.63%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
80.13%
6M
75.56%
1Y
82.10%
3Y*
24.57%
5Y*
23.51%
10Y*
13.59%

SRUUF

1D
-3.17%
1M
-7.66%
YTD
-2.76%
6M
2.55%
1Y
16.28%
3Y*
13.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRNT.L vs. SRUUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BRNT.L
WisdomTree Brent Crude Oil
80.13%-6.34%7.45%1.08%35.10%13.03%
SRUUF
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund
-2.76%12.66%-18.89%82.09%7.65%17.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BRNT.L and SRUUF is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2021

0.11

The correlation between BRNT.L and SRUUF shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRNT.L vs. SRUUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRNT.L
BRNT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BRNT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRNT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRNT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
BRNT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRNT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

SRUUF
SRUUF Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
SRUUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRUUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRUUF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SRUUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRUUF Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRNT.L vs. SRUUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Brent Crude Oil (BRNT.L) and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRNT.LSRUUFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.11

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

0.71

+3.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.41

1.43

+6.99

BRNT.L vs. SRUUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRNT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the SRUUF Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRNT.L and SRUUF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRNT.LSRUUFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

0.47

+1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.38

-0.34

Drawdowns

BRNT.L vs. SRUUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRNT.L drawdown since its inception was -85.97%, which is greater than SRUUF's maximum drawdown of -48.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRNT.L and SRUUF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRNT.LSRUUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.97%

-48.68%

-37.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.66%

-22.98%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.88%

-48.68%

+23.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.61%

-24.46%

+14.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.63%

-21.79%

-26.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.02%

11.43%

-1.41%

Volatility

BRNT.L vs. SRUUF - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Brent Crude Oil (BRNT.L) has a higher volatility of 15.37% compared to Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) at 8.23%. This indicates that BRNT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRUUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRNT.LSRUUFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.37%

8.23%

+7.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.91%

24.71%

+12.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.09%

34.59%

+7.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.68%

41.80%

-7.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.36%

41.80%

-6.44%

BRNT.L vs. SRUUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRNT.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SRUUF's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRNT.L vs. SRUUF - Dividend Comparison

Neither BRNT.L nor SRUUF has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BRNT.L and SRUUF have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRNT.L and SRUUF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer