PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRMSX vs. RPIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRMSX vs. RPIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bramshill Income Performance Fund (BRMSX) and T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund (RPIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRMSX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than RPIEX's 3.29% return.


BRMSX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.50%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.43%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
4.92%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*

RPIEX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.00%
YTD
3.29%
6M
4.66%
1Y
5.90%
3Y*
4.50%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*
2.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRMSX vs. RPIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRMSX
Bramshill Income Performance Fund
1.24%4.78%3.10%7.12%-6.11%2.53%7.49%8.87%0.68%0.97%
RPIEX
T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund
3.29%4.82%6.83%-4.51%3.08%0.08%9.42%-0.39%0.89%-1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BRMSX and RPIEX is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

-0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRMSX vs. RPIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRMSX
BRMSX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BRMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BRMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

RPIEX
RPIEX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
RPIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RPIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRMSX vs. RPIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bramshill Income Performance Fund (BRMSX) and T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund (RPIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRMSXRPIEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.31

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.67

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.94

5.62

-1.68

BRMSX vs. RPIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the RPIEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRMSX and RPIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRMSX vs. RPIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRMSX drawdown since its inception was -17.06%, which is greater than RPIEX's maximum drawdown of -9.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRMSX and RPIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRMSXRPIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.06%

-9.59%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

-3.64%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.52%

-3.64%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.49%

-9.59%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.13%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.90%

-2.47%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

1.08%

+0.16%

Volatility

BRMSX vs. RPIEX - Volatility Comparison

Bramshill Income Performance Fund (BRMSX) and T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund (RPIEX) have volatilities of 1.02% and 1.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRMSXRPIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

1.03%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.20%

3.88%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.30%

4.40%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.11%

4.91%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.25%

4.19%

+1.06%

BRMSX vs. RPIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRMSX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than RPIEX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRMSX vs. RPIEX - Dividend Comparison

BRMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than RPIEX's 7.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BRMSX
Bramshill Income Performance Fund
4.38%3.96%4.36%4.49%2.53%2.50%3.38%3.38%4.08%3.43%0.00%
RPIEX
T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund
7.51%7.69%6.32%4.68%15.28%3.76%1.93%2.51%4.36%0.61%2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRMSX and RPIEX have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPIEX has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to BRMSX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRMSX dropped -17.06% vs RPIEX's -9.59%.

RPIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRMSX and RPIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer