PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRMKX vs. DNLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRMKX vs. DNLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund (BRMKX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BRMKX having a 14.65% return and DNLDX slightly lower at 14.42%. Over the past 10 years, BRMKX has outperformed DNLDX with an annualized return of 11.53%, while DNLDX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.16% annualized return.


BRMKX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.65%
6M
10.51%
YTD
14.65%
1Y
20.31%
3Y*
14.89%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*
11.53%
ALL TIME*
11.88%

DNLDX

1D
-0.50%
1M
0.15%
6M
10.62%
YTD
14.42%
1Y
20.58%
3Y*
16.75%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
10.16%
ALL TIME*
10.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BRMKX vs. DNLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRMKX
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund
14.65%10.48%15.28%17.30%-17.22%22.52%17.17%30.47%-9.09%17.74%
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
14.42%9.79%22.27%16.99%-14.34%26.49%9.29%16.82%-14.46%16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between BRMKX and DNLDX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.97

The correlation between BRMKX and DNLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRMKX vs. DNLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BRMKX
BRMKX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BRMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
BRMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

DNLDX
DNLDX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DNLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BRMKX vs. DNLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund (BRMKX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRMKXDNLDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

2.57

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.93

9.63

-0.70

BRMKX vs. DNLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRMKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the DNLDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRMKX and DNLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRMKX vs. DNLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRMKX drawdown since its inception was -40.20%, smaller than the maximum DNLDX drawdown of -63.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRMKX and DNLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRMKXDNLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.20%

-63.69%

+23.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-7.29%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.07%

-20.42%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-23.42%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.20%

-42.23%

+2.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-1.16%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.58%

-9.60%

+4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

1.95%

+0.15%

Volatility

BRMKX vs. DNLDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund (BRMKX) is 2.45%, while BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that BRMKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DNLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRMKXDNLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

2.77%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

10.02%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.72%

13.49%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.24%

18.49%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

19.46%

-0.20%

BRMKX vs. DNLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRMKX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than DNLDX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRMKX vs. DNLDX - Dividend Comparison

BRMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, less than DNLDX's 13.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRMKX
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund
5.21%5.92%6.43%3.02%3.67%4.07%2.86%3.95%3.87%19.24%2.11%0.00%
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
13.13%14.15%15.24%1.69%8.82%17.74%2.77%2.65%11.14%11.32%1.00%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, BRMKX and DNLDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DNLDX has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to BRMKX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRMKX dropped -40.20% vs DNLDX's -63.69%.

DNLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRMKX and DNLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer