BRLN vs. JHLN

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

BRLN (BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF) and JHLN (John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF) are both Bank Loan funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BRLN charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for JHLN.

Performance

BRLN vs. JHLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) and John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF (JHLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRLN achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly higher than JHLN's 0.77% return.

BRLN

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 1.86%
• 6M: 2.22%
• 1Y: 5.60%
• 3Y*: 7.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JHLN

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 6M: 1.19%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRLN vs. JHLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BRLN BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF	1.86%	1.95%
JHLN John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF	0.77%	1.55%

Correlation

The correlation between BRLN and JHLN is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.20

Return for Risk

BRLN vs. JHLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRLN

BRLN Risk / Return Rank: 63
BRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
BRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
BRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 64
BRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
BRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 65

JHLN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRLN vs. JHLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) and John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF (JHLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BRLN	JHLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.31	—	—

Drawdowns

BRLN vs. JHLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRLN drawdown since its inception was -3.85%, which is greater than JHLN's maximum drawdown of -1.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRLN and JHLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRLN	JHLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.85%	-1.46%	-2.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.04%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.32%	-0.31%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.52%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BRLN	JHLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.18%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.16%	2.63%	+0.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.75%	2.63%	+1.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.75%	2.63%	+1.12%

BRLN vs. JHLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRLN has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than JHLN's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRLN vs. JHLN - Dividend Comparison

BRLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, more than JHLN's 3.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BRLN BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF	6.32%	6.50%	7.87%	9.06%	1.48%
JHLN John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF	3.85%	1.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRLN and JHLN in my portfolio?

BRLN and JHLN have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BRLN or JHLN?

On fees, BRLN is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRLN or JHLN?

BRLN is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for JHLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BRLN or JHLN?

BRLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.32%, compared with 3.85% for JHLN.

What is the main difference between BRLN and JHLN?

They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and John Hancock. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for BRLN and 0.59% for JHLN.