BRKY.NEO vs. XRPP.TO
BRKY.NEO (Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF) and XRPP.TO (Purpose XRP ETF CAD Currency Hedged Units) are both exchange-traded funds - BRKY.NEO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while XRPP.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. BRKY.NEO charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for XRPP.TO.
Performance
BRKY.NEO vs. XRPP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRKY.NEO achieves a -6.22% return, which is significantly higher than XRPP.TO's -36.13% return.
BRKY.NEO
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- -6.22%
- 6M
- -6.18%
- 1Y
- -4.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPP.TO
- 1D
- -2.60%
- 1M
- -16.80%
- YTD
- -36.13%
- 6M
- -42.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRKY.NEO vs. XRPP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BRKY.NEO Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF | -6.22% | 2.46% |
XRPP.TO Purpose XRP ETF CAD Currency Hedged Units | -36.13% | -15.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRKY.NEO and XRPP.TO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRKY.NEO vs. XRPP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BRKY.NEO
XRPP.TO
BRKY.NEO vs. XRPP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF (BRKY.NEO) and Purpose XRP ETF CAD Currency Hedged Units (XRPP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRKY.NEO | XRPP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRKY.NEO | XRPP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | -0.64 | +1.50 |
Drawdowns
BRKY.NEO vs. XRPP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRKY.NEO drawdown since its inception was -17.43%, smaller than the maximum XRPP.TO drawdown of -67.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKY.NEO and XRPP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRKY.NEO | XRPP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.43% | -67.53% | +50.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.05% | -67.53% | +52.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -38.65% | +33.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.00% | — | — |
Volatility
BRKY.NEO vs. XRPP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRKY.NEO | XRPP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.23% | 74.49% | -59.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 74.49% | -56.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 74.49% | -56.72% |
BRKY.NEO vs. XRPP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRKY.NEO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than XRPP.TO's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRKY.NEO vs. XRPP.TO - Dividend Comparison
BRKY.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, while XRPP.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKY.NEO Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 7.55% | 5.58% | 11.30% | 5.40% | 0.49% |
XRPP.TO Purpose XRP ETF CAD Currency Hedged Units | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRKY.NEO and XRPP.TO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKY.NEO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKY.NEO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for XRPP.TO.
BRKY.NEO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XRPP.TO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BRKY.NEO and 1.00% for XRPP.TO.
Find the right allocation for BRKY.NEO and XRPP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer