PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRKY.NEO vs. KNGC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BRKY.NEO vs. KNGC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF (BRKY.NEO) and Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BRKY.NEO vs. KNGC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BRKY.NEO
Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF
-6.22%9.35%17.59%
KNGC.TO
Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF
17.17%41.07%110,085.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRKY.NEO achieves a -6.22% return, which is significantly lower than KNGC.TO's 17.17% return.


BRKY.NEO

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
-6.22%
6M
-5.97%
1Y
-13.83%
3Y*
16.55%
5Y*
10Y*

KNGC.TO

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.80%
YTD
17.17%
6M
25.90%
1Y
64.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BRKY.NEO vs. KNGC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRKY.NEO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than KNGC.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BRKY.NEO vs. KNGC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRKY.NEO
BRKY.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BRKY.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRKY.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRKY.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BRKY.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRKY.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

KNGC.TO
KNGC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
KNGC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRKY.NEO vs. KNGC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF (BRKY.NEO) and Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRKY.NEOKNGC.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.67

4.09

-4.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.83

4.74

-5.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.88

-0.99

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

5.43

-6.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.29

28.53

-29.81

BRKY.NEO vs. KNGC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRKY.NEO Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the KNGC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRKY.NEO and KNGC.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRKY.NEOKNGC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.67

4.09

-4.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.08

+0.81

Correlation

The correlation between BRKY.NEO and KNGC.TO is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BRKY.NEO vs. KNGC.TO - Dividend Comparison

BRKY.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, more than KNGC.TO's 1.64% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
BRKY.NEO
Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF
6.90%5.58%10.93%5.40%0.49%
KNGC.TO
Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF
1.64%1.69%0.73%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BRKY.NEO vs. KNGC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRKY.NEO drawdown since its inception was -17.36%, smaller than the maximum KNGC.TO drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKY.NEO and KNGC.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BRKY.NEOKNGC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.36%

-20.25%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.36%

-11.79%

-5.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.05%

-0.23%

-14.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.13%

-3.29%

-1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.91%

2.24%

+8.67%

Volatility

BRKY.NEO vs. KNGC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF (BRKY.NEO) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) at 2.78%. This indicates that BRKY.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNGC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BRKY.NEOKNGC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

2.78%

+2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

9.97%

+2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.66%

15.82%

+4.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.01%

80,119.00%

-80,100.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

80,119.00%

-80,100.99%