BRKW vs. PEPS

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BRKW (Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF) and PEPS (Parametric Equity Plus ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BRKW returned 1.28% vs 24.84% for PEPS. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BRKW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for PEPS.

Performance

BRKW vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRKW achieves a -4.36% return, which is significantly lower than PEPS's 10.53% return.

BRKW

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -0.94%
• 6M: -1.84%
• YTD: -4.36%
• 1Y: 1.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PEPS

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 0.75%
• 6M: 8.66%
• YTD: 10.53%
• 1Y: 24.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRKW vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	-4.36%	1.85%
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF	10.53%	18.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BRKW and PEPS is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.07

Return for Risk

BRKW vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRKW

BRKW Risk / Return Rank: 10
BRKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
BRKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BRKW Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BRKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
BRKW Martin Ratio Rank: 11

PEPS

PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 69
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 69
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRKW vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BRKW	PEPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.07	1.80	-1.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.22	2.41	-2.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.33	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.10	2.55	-2.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.20	11.24	-11.04

BRKW vs. PEPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRKW Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the PEPS Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRKW and PEPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BRKW vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRKW drawdown since its inception was -12.64%, smaller than the maximum PEPS drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKW and PEPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRKW	PEPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.64%	-21.26%	+8.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.64%	-9.80%	-2.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.41%	-0.66%	-6.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.50%	-2.70%	-2.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.32%	2.22%	+4.10%

Volatility

BRKW vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) at 3.50%. This indicates that BRKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRKW	PEPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	3.50%	+1.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.23%	10.90%	+2.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.23%	13.85%	+3.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.25%	18.16%	-0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.25%	18.16%	-0.91%

BRKW vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRKW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRKW vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison

BRKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.30%, more than PEPS's 0.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	25.30%	14.45%	0.00%
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF	0.92%	1.00%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRKW and PEPS in my portfolio?

BRKW and PEPS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BRKW or PEPS?

BRKW has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to PEPS (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRKW dropped -12.64% vs PEPS's -21.26%.

Which ETF is better, BRKW or PEPS?

On 1-year performance, PEPS leads with 24.84% vs 1.28% for BRKW. On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, PEPS has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BRKW or PEPS?

Over the 1-year period, PEPS has performed better with a 24.84% return vs 1.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRKW or PEPS?

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BRKW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BRKW or PEPS?

BRKW has the higher dividend yield at 25.30%, compared with 0.92% for PEPS.

What is the main difference between BRKW and PEPS?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BRKW and 0.10% for PEPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PEPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.