PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRKC vs. TSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRKC vs. TSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) and Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares (TSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRKC achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than TSMX's 84.37% return.


BRKC

1D
0.26%
1M
1.71%
YTD
-0.82%
6M
-0.54%
1Y
-1.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSMX

1D
1.87%
1M
15.44%
YTD
84.37%
6M
90.23%
1Y
217.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRKC vs. TSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BRKC and TSMX is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRKC vs. TSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRKC
BRKC Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BRKC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRKC Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRKC Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
BRKC Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRKC Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMX
TSMX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRKC vs. TSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) and Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares (TSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRKCTSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.37

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

6.28

-6.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.41

20.03

-20.44

BRKC vs. TSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRKC Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the TSMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRKC and TSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRKC vs. TSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRKC drawdown since its inception was -7.59%, smaller than the maximum TSMX drawdown of -63.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKC and TSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRKCTSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.59%

-63.80%

+56.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-34.93%

+27.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-11.57%

+8.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-15.58%

+12.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

10.92%

-7.19%

Volatility

BRKC vs. TSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) is 2.40%, while Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares (TSMX) has a volatility of 32.81%. This indicates that BRKC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRKCTSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

32.81%

-30.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

60.03%

-50.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.58%

76.64%

-64.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.46%

82.58%

-70.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.46%

82.58%

-70.12%

BRKC vs. TSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRKC has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than TSMX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRKC vs. TSMX - Dividend Comparison

BRKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.90%, more than TSMX's 4.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BRKC
YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF
20.90%10.81%0.00%
TSMX
Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares
4.60%8.01%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRKC and TSMX have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMX has higher volatility (32.81%) compared to BRKC (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRKC dropped -7.59% vs TSMX's -63.80%.

On 1-year performance, TSMX leads with 217.78% vs -1.49% for BRKC. On fees, BRKC is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, BRKC has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMX has performed better with a 217.78% return vs -1.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BRKC is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSMX.

BRKC has the higher dividend yield at 20.90%, compared with 4.60% for TSMX.

BRKC is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSMX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BRKC and 1.05% for TSMX.

TSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRKC and TSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer