BRKC vs. FTQI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BRKC (YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF) and FTQI (First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BRKC is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while FTQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. BRKC is actively managed, while FTQI is passively managed. Over the past year, BRKC returned 1.21% vs 26.34% for FTQI. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BRKC charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FTQI.

Performance

BRKC vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRKC achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly lower than FTQI's 12.76% return.

BRKC

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: -0.45%
• 6M: -0.20%
• YTD: -1.60%
• 1Y: 1.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTQI

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 1.28%
• 6M: 11.68%
• YTD: 12.76%
• 1Y: 26.34%
• 3Y*: 16.62%
• 5Y*: 12.26%
• 10Y*: 7.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRKC vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BRKC YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF	-1.60%	0.76%
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF	12.76%	15.35%

Correlation

The correlation between BRKC and FTQI is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.01

Return for Risk

BRKC vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRKC

BRKC Risk / Return Rank: 11
BRKC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
BRKC Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BRKC Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BRKC Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
BRKC Martin Ratio Rank: 11

FTQI

FTQI Risk / Return Rank: 91
FTQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FTQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FTQI Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FTQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FTQI Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRKC vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BRKC	FTQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.10	2.43	-2.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.22	3.37	-3.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.45	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	4.24	-4.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.33	20.07	-19.74

BRKC vs. FTQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRKC Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the FTQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRKC and FTQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BRKC vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRKC drawdown since its inception was -7.59%, smaller than the maximum FTQI drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKC and FTQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRKC	FTQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.59%	-19.42%	+11.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.59%	-6.24%	-1.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.58%	-0.85%	-2.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.12%	-3.73%	+0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.65%	1.32%	+2.33%

Volatility

BRKC vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) at 2.92%. This indicates that BRKC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRKC	FTQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.07%	2.92%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.90%	8.83%	+1.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.50%	10.87%	+1.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.42%	14.82%	-2.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.42%	12.98%	-0.56%

BRKC vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRKC has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRKC vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison

BRKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.87%, more than FTQI's 10.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BRKC YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF	21.87%	10.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF	10.92%	11.46%	11.66%	11.49%	9.85%	3.05%	3.27%	2.95%	3.27%	2.74%	3.02%	3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRKC and FTQI in my portfolio?

BRKC and FTQI have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BRKC or FTQI?

BRKC has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to FTQI (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRKC dropped -7.59% vs FTQI's -19.42%.

Which ETF is better, BRKC or FTQI?

On 1-year performance, FTQI leads with 26.34% vs 1.21% for BRKC. On fees, FTQI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FTQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BRKC or FTQI?

Over the 1-year period, FTQI has performed better with a 26.34% return vs 1.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRKC or FTQI?

FTQI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BRKC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BRKC or FTQI?

BRKC has the higher dividend yield at 21.87%, compared with 10.92% for FTQI.

What is the main difference between BRKC and FTQI?

BRKC is categorized as Derivative Income, while FTQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BRKC and 0.75% for FTQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.