BRIC.L vs. ISDE.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BRIC.L (iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF (Dist) GBP) and ISDE.L (iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from iShares - BRIC.L tracks the FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index while ISDE.L tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Islamic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BRIC.L returned 3.77%/yr vs 13.94%/yr for ISDE.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BRIC.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for ISDE.L.

Performance

BRIC.L vs. ISDE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF (Dist) GBP (BRIC.L) and iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BRIC.L is traded in GBp, while ISDE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISDE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRIC.L achieves a -9.11% return, which is significantly lower than ISDE.L's 60.76% return. Over the past 10 years, BRIC.L has underperformed ISDE.L with an annualized return of 3.77%, while ISDE.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.94% annualized return.

BRIC.L

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -4.88%
• YTD: -9.11%
• 6M: -12.88%
• 1Y: -1.80%
• 3Y*: 6.39%
• 5Y*: -6.66%
• 10Y*: 3.77%

ISDE.L

• 1D: -2.79%
• 1M: 14.45%
• YTD: 60.76%
• 6M: 63.75%
• 1Y: 109.18%
• 3Y*: 28.97%
• 5Y*: 14.04%
• 10Y*: 13.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRIC.L vs. ISDE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BRIC.L iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF (Dist) GBP	-9.11%	20.80%	15.70%	-12.64%	-20.29%	-23.12%	15.97%	17.97%	-3.04%	24.05%
ISDE.L iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	60.71%	30.46%	-1.86%	8.28%	-13.53%	3.61%	18.62%	14.85%	-12.37%	29.47%

Correlation

The correlation between BRIC.L and ISDE.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2008	0.60

The correlation between BRIC.L and ISDE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.68 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BRIC.L vs. ISDE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BRIC.L	ISDE.L
Consumer Cyclical	31.8%	5.3%
Financial Services	26.2%	3.7%
Communication Services	18.2%	0.9%
Energy	7.3%	10.1%
Technology	5.6%	48.0%
Basic Materials	5.2%	12.2%
Healthcare	2.5%	4.8%
Real Estate	1.5%	0.9%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	3.3%
Industrials	0.4%	8.6%
Utilities	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

BRIC.L vs. ISDE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRIC.L

BRIC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8
BRIC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
BRIC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
BRIC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8
BRIC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
BRIC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8

ISDE.L

ISDE.L Risk / Return Rank: 95
ISDE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ISDE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
ISDE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 95
ISDE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ISDE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRIC.L vs. ISDE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF (Dist) GBP (BRIC.L) and iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BRIC.L	ISDE.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.07	4.61	-4.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.03	5.26	-5.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.79	-0.79
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.07	8.63	-8.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.14	31.10	-31.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BRIC.L vs. ISDE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRIC.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the ISDE.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRIC.L and ISDE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BRIC.L	ISDE.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07	4.61	-4.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.23	0.79	-1.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15	0.72	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.36	-0.24

Drawdowns

BRIC.L vs. ISDE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRIC.L drawdown since its inception was -63.13%, which is greater than ISDE.L's maximum drawdown of -46.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRIC.L and ISDE.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRIC.L	ISDE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.13%	-46.71%	-16.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.84%	-12.58%	-6.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.78%	-21.66%	-1.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.50%	-21.66%	-30.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.20%	-26.22%	-32.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.46%	-3.34%	-38.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.86%	-14.03%	-7.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.59%	3.50%	+5.09%

Volatility

BRIC.L vs. ISDE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF (Dist) GBP (BRIC.L) is 7.20%, while iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L) has a volatility of 11.38%. This indicates that BRIC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISDE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRIC.L	ISDE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.20%	11.38%	-4.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.09%	20.94%	-7.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.29%	23.54%	-5.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.81%	17.76%	+11.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.45%	19.28%	+6.17%

BRIC.L vs. ISDE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRIC.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than ISDE.L's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRIC.L vs. ISDE.L - Dividend Comparison

BRIC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than ISDE.L's 1.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BRIC.L iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF (Dist) GBP	1.61%	1.76%	2.77%	2.67%	3.63%	1.60%	1.49%	2.07%	2.95%	1.99%	1.86%	2.62%
ISDE.L iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	1.08%	1.86%	2.51%	2.77%	2.10%	1.79%	0.98%	1.55%	1.64%	1.02%	1.07%	2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRIC.L and ISDE.L in my portfolio?

BRIC.L and ISDE.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BRIC.L or ISDE.L?

On fees, BRIC.L is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRIC.L or ISDE.L?

BRIC.L is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ISDE.L.

What is the main difference between BRIC.L and ISDE.L?

BRIC.L tracks FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index, while ISDE.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Islamic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for BRIC.L and 0.85% for ISDE.L.