PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
BRIC.AS vs. EXX7.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

BRIC.AS vs. EXX7.DE

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

BRIC.AS (iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF) and EXX7.DE (iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (DE)) are both exchange-traded funds - BRIC.AS is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index, while EXX7.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Nikkei 225®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BRIC.AS returned 2.05%/yr vs 12.37%/yr for EXX7.DE. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BRIC.AS charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for EXX7.DE.

Performance

BRIC.AS vs. EXX7.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF (BRIC.AS) and iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXX7.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRIC.AS achieves a -16.10% return, which is significantly lower than EXX7.DE's 41.01% return. Over the past 10 years, BRIC.AS has underperformed EXX7.DE with an annualized return of 2.05%, while EXX7.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.37% annualized return.

BRIC.AS

1D
-2.87%
1M
-9.79%
YTD
-16.10%
6M
-16.03%
1Y
-11.96%
3Y*
3.10%
5Y*
-9.03%
10Y*
2.05%

EXX7.DE

1D
2.08%
1M
9.65%
YTD
41.01%
6M
41.52%
1Y
69.58%
3Y*
24.20%
5Y*
13.28%
10Y*
12.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRIC.AS vs. EXX7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRIC.AS
iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF		-16.10%15.29%19.91%-10.17%-24.74%-17.47%9.83%24.15%-4.06%20.26%
EXX7.DE
iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (DE)		41.01%15.66%13.98%17.44%-15.74%2.85%13.66%24.14%-5.55%10.13%

Correlation

The correlation between BRIC.AS and EXX7.DE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2007

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between BRIC.AS and EXX7.DE has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF

iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (DE)

Often compared with BRIC.AS:
BRIC.AS vs. R1GR.ASBRIC.AS vs. IMAE.ASBRIC.AS vs. CNDX.ASBRIC.AS vs. EUEA.ASBRIC.AS vs. IWDA.ASBRIC.AS vs. CSPX.ASBRIC.AS vs. DFND.AS
Often compared with EXX7.DE:
EXX7.DE vs. S400.LEXX7.DE vs. EUN.LEXX7.DE vs. EWJEXX7.DE vs. SPYEXX7.DE vs. VUAA.LEXX7.DE vs. IUS4.DEEXX7.DE vs. FLJP

Return for Risk

BRIC.AS vs. EXX7.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BRIC.AS
BRIC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BRIC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRIC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRIC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BRIC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRIC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
EXX7.DE
EXX7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
EXX7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXX7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXX7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EXX7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXX7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRIC.AS vs. EXX7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF (BRIC.AS) and iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXX7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

BRIC.ASEXX7.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.64
2.80

-3.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.80
3.80

-4.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.46

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

5.34

-5.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

15.94

-17.15

BRIC.AS vs. EXX7.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRIC.AS Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the EXX7.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRIC.AS and EXX7.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRIC.AS vs. EXX7.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRIC.AS drawdown since its inception was -73.80%, which is greater than EXX7.DE's maximum drawdown of -50.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRIC.AS and EXX7.DE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

BRIC.ASEXX7.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.80%

-50.57%

-23.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.22%

-12.97%

-11.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.22%

-20.64%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.42%

-21.40%

-31.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.58%

-29.85%

-28.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.01%

-2.04%

-43.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.49%

-12.13%

-22.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.86%

4.35%

+5.51%

Volatility

BRIC.AS vs. EXX7.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF (BRIC.AS) is 6.19%, while iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXX7.DE) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that BRIC.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXX7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

BRIC.ASEXX7.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

9.13%

-2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.19%

19.87%

-6.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.57%

24.70%

-6.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.95%

18.91%

+10.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.59%

17.85%

+7.74%

BRIC.AS vs. EXX7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRIC.AS has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than EXX7.DE's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRIC.AS vs. EXX7.DE - Dividend Comparison

BRIC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than EXX7.DE's 0.72% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRIC.AS
iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF		1.74%1.78%2.75%2.64%3.71%1.56%1.49%2.06%2.99%1.98%1.84%2.72%
EXX7.DE
iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (DE)		0.72%0.92%0.94%1.17%1.31%0.81%1.00%1.21%0.53%1.19%1.35%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

BRIC.AS and EXX7.DE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EXX7.DE is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EXX7.DE is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for BRIC.AS.

BRIC.AS is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EXX7.DE is Japan Equities. BRIC.AS tracks FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index, while EXX7.DE tracks Nikkei 225®. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for BRIC.AS and 0.51% for EXX7.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRIC.AS and EXX7.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer