EXX7.DE vs. S400.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXX7.DE) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L).
EXX7.DE and S400.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EXX7.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Nikkei 225®. It was launched on Jul 5, 2006. S400.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco Investment Management Limited that tracks the performance of the TOPIX TR JPY. It was launched on Sep 10, 2014. Both EXX7.DE and S400.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EXX7.DE or S400.L.
Key characteristics
| EXX7.DE | S400.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.76% | 6.95% |
| 1Y Return | 15.70% | 11.85% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.79% | 3.23% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.75% | 4.91% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.16% | 7.85% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.87 | 0.73 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.27 | 1.06 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.17 | 1.15 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.02 | 1.02 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.78 | 3.34 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.60% | 3.46% |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.80% | 15.69% |
| Max Drawdown | -50.57% | -24.69% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.76% | -4.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between EXX7.DE and S400.L is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EXX7.DE vs. S400.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EXX7.DE achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly higher than S400.L's 6.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EXX7.DE having a 8.16% annualized return and S400.L not far behind at 7.85%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXX7.DE vs. S400.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXX7.DE has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than S400.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EXX7.DE vs. S400.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXX7.DE) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EXX7.DE vs. S400.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EXX7.DE nor S400.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXX7.DE iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (DE) | 0.00% | 0.42% | 1.31% | 0.81% | 1.00% | 1.21% | 0.53% | 1.19% | 1.35% | 1.29% | 0.86% | 0.96% |
S400.L Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EXX7.DE vs. S400.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXX7.DE drawdown since its inception was -50.57%, which is greater than S400.L's maximum drawdown of -24.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXX7.DE and S400.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EXX7.DE vs. S400.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXX7.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L) at 4.55%. This indicates that EXX7.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than S400.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.