BRIB vs. HTAB
BRIB (FIS Bright Portfolios Core Bond ETF) and HTAB (Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BRIB charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for HTAB.
Performance
BRIB vs. HTAB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BRIB
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
HTAB
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- 6M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 6.53%
- 3Y*
- 2.85%
- 5Y*
- 0.45%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $65.01K | $81.24K | $364.25K | |
| $688.41K | $744.37K | $975.38K |
BRIB vs. HTAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BRIB FIS Bright Portfolios Core Bond ETF | 0.62% |
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF | -0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRIB and HTAB is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRIB vs. HTAB — Risk / Return Rank
BRIB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HTAB
BRIB vs. HTAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIS Bright Portfolios Core Bond ETF (BRIB) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRIB | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRIB vs. HTAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRIB drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum HTAB drawdown of -14.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRIB and HTAB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRIB | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -14.76% | +13.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -1.63% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.44% | -2.86% | +2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.91% | — |
Volatility
BRIB vs. HTAB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRIB | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.09% | 3.98% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.09% | 5.75% | -1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.09% | 5.14% | -1.05% |
BRIB vs. HTAB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRIB has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than HTAB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRIB vs. HTAB - Dividend Comparison
BRIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than HTAB's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRIB FIS Bright Portfolios Core Bond ETF | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF | 3.90% | 3.88% | 3.57% | 3.21% | 2.26% | 2.18% | 1.64% | 2.77% | 1.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRIB and HTAB have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HTAB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HTAB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BRIB.
HTAB has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 1.03% for BRIB.
They also come from different issuers: Faith Investor Services and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for BRIB and 0.39% for HTAB.
Find the right allocation for BRIB and HTAB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer