PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRGIX vs. CHASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRGIX vs. CHASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridges Investment Fund (BRGIX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRGIX achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than CHASX's 24.37% return. Over the past 10 years, BRGIX has underperformed CHASX with an annualized return of 14.33%, while CHASX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.13% annualized return.


BRGIX

1D
1.43%
1M
-3.68%
YTD
0.73%
6M
-0.04%
1Y
8.19%
3Y*
15.94%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*
14.33%

CHASX

1D
1.50%
1M
0.31%
YTD
24.37%
6M
23.43%
1Y
42.15%
3Y*
39.44%
5Y*
21.78%
10Y*
20.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRGIX vs. CHASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRGIX
Bridges Investment Fund
0.73%10.86%27.84%38.93%-28.77%25.81%26.48%32.17%-3.78%21.97%
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
24.37%20.61%64.71%25.91%-20.41%22.32%18.27%42.63%-3.96%24.49%

Correlation

The correlation between BRGIX and CHASX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 1997

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between BRGIX and CHASX has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRGIX vs. CHASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRGIX
BRGIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BRGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BRGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

CHASX
CHASX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CHASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHASX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
CHASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHASX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRGIX vs. CHASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridges Investment Fund (BRGIX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRGIXCHASXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.40

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

4.35

-3.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.07

17.80

-15.73

BRGIX vs. CHASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the CHASX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRGIX and CHASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRGIX vs. CHASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRGIX drawdown since its inception was -56.58%, which is greater than CHASX's maximum drawdown of -45.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRGIX and CHASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRGIXCHASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.58%

-45.94%

-10.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.91%

-9.90%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.79%

-23.40%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.57%

-24.63%

-7.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.52%

-30.40%

-4.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.16%

-1.95%

-2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.48%

-9.14%

-3.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

2.41%

+1.74%

Volatility

BRGIX vs. CHASX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bridges Investment Fund (BRGIX) is 5.34%, while Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) has a volatility of 6.95%. This indicates that BRGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRGIXCHASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

6.95%

-1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.03%

14.37%

-3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

18.39%

-4.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.85%

20.40%

-0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.09%

19.95%

+0.14%

BRGIX vs. CHASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRGIX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than CHASX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRGIX vs. CHASX - Dividend Comparison

BRGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, more than CHASX's 7.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRGIX
Bridges Investment Fund
11.04%11.12%10.41%3.50%7.19%6.81%3.90%3.73%1.65%3.83%1.34%1.63%
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
7.33%9.12%36.67%5.80%5.49%20.15%7.83%22.82%12.92%11.92%9.14%10.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRGIX and CHASX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHASX has higher volatility (6.95%) compared to BRGIX (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRGIX dropped -56.58% vs CHASX's -45.94%.

CHASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRGIX and CHASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer