BRF vs. VXUS
BRF (VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BRF is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MVIS Brazil Small-Cap Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BRF returned 5.57%/yr vs 10.23%/yr for VXUS. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BRF charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
BRF vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRF achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 12.51% return. Over the past 10 years, BRF has underperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 5.57%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.23% annualized return.
BRF
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -7.29%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 14.35%
- 3Y*
- 0.89%
- 5Y*
- -4.70%
- 10Y*
- 5.57%
VXUS
- 1D
- -3.04%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- 29.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
BRF vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRF VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF | 1.35% | 54.17% | -35.02% | 37.21% | -14.38% | -20.40% | -21.07% | 40.66% | -12.07% | 54.63% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 12.51% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 27.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRF and VXUS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011 | 0.59 |
The correlation between BRF and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
BRF vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BRF
VXUS
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Technology
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
BRF
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
BRF
VXUS
Basic Materials
BRF
VXUS
Industrials
BRF
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
BRF
VXUS
Utilities
BRF
VXUS
Financial Services
BRF
VXUS
Healthcare
BRF
VXUS
Energy
BRF
VXUS
Technology
BRF
VXUS
Communication Services
BRF
-
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRF vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
BRF
VXUS
BRF vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRF | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.34 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 2.62 | -1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | 10.07 | -7.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRF vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRF drawdown since its inception was -82.26%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRF and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRF | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.26% | -35.97% | -46.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.29% | -11.27% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.81% | -13.58% | -24.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.24% | -29.44% | -19.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.43% | -35.97% | -24.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.59% | -3.04% | -47.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.74% | -8.20% | -37.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.89% | 2.93% | +3.96% |
Volatility
BRF vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) has a higher volatility of 8.03% compared to Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) at 7.07%. This indicates that BRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRF | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.03% | 7.07% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.43% | 14.44% | +8.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.85% | 16.36% | +12.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.72% | 16.27% | +15.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.88% | 17.03% | +16.85% |
BRF vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRF vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
BRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, more than VXUS's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRF VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF | 5.47% | 5.54% | 4.08% | 5.02% | 4.13% | 2.96% | 1.66% | 2.54% | 2.89% | 4.53% | 4.25% | 3.84% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.59% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRF and VXUS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRF has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to VXUS (7.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRF dropped -82.26% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 10-year performance, VXUS leads with 10.23% vs 5.57% for BRF. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VXUS has been the lower-risk option at 7.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 10.23% return vs 5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BRF.
BRF has the higher dividend yield at 5.47%, compared with 2.59% for VXUS.
BRF is categorized as Latin America Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. BRF tracks MVIS Brazil Small-Cap Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BRF and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRF and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer