PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRF vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRF vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRF achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.


BRF

1D
-0.43%
1M
-0.31%
6M
-12.16%
YTD
1.34%
1Y
20.04%
3Y*
-0.14%
5Y*
-2.02%
10Y*
3.54%
ALL TIME*
1.74%

SBIT

1D
5.60%
1M
-6.04%
6M
32.41%
YTD
39.44%
1Y
98.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-42.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$47.50K$48.62K$103.93K
$29.57M$32.71M$46.48M

BRF vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BRF
VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF
1.34%54.17%-30.63%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
39.44%-25.11%-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between BRF and SBIT is -0.33, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRF vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BRF
BRF Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRF Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRF Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BRF vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRFSBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.23

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

2.35

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.45

5.19

-2.73

BRF vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRF Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRF and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRF vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRF drawdown since its inception was -82.26%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRF and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRFSBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.26%

-91.35%

+9.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.51%

-47.94%

+27.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.60%

-77.87%

+27.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.77%

-69.07%

+23.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.97%

21.67%

-12.70%

Volatility

BRF vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) is 7.18%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that BRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRFSBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.18%

18.09%

-10.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.54%

67.10%

-44.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.04%

88.65%

-59.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.50%

96.10%

-64.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.82%

96.10%

-62.28%

BRF vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRF vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

BRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, more than SBIT's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRF
VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF
5.47%5.54%4.08%5.02%4.13%2.96%1.66%2.54%2.89%4.53%4.25%3.84%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
4.03%0.52%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRF and SBIT have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to BRF (7.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRF dropped -82.26% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 20.04% for BRF. On fees, BRF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BRF has been the lower-risk option at 7.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 20.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BRF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

BRF has the higher dividend yield at 5.47%, compared with 4.03% for SBIT.

BRF is categorized as Latin America Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. BRF tracks MVIS Brazil Small-Cap Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BRF and 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRF and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer