BRF vs. OTGL
BRF (VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF) and OTGL (OTG Latin America ETF) are both Latin America Equities funds - BRF tracks the MVIS Brazil Small-Cap Index while OTGL tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BRF charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OTGL.
Performance
BRF vs. OTGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRF achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly lower than OTGL's 5.63% return.
BRF
- 1D
- -4.64%
- 1M
- -10.08%
- YTD
- 5.08%
- 6M
- -0.52%
- 1Y
- 20.45%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- -3.39%
- 10Y*
- 6.61%
OTGL
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRF vs. OTGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BRF VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF | 5.08% | 17.65% |
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF | 5.63% | 13.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRF and OTGL is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRF vs. OTGL — Risk / Return Rank
BRF
OTGL
BRF vs. OTGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) and OTG Latin America ETF (OTGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRF | OTGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.58 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRF | OTGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 1.20 | -1.15 |
Drawdowns
BRF vs. OTGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRF drawdown since its inception was -82.26%, which is greater than OTGL's maximum drawdown of -13.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRF and OTGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRF | OTGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.26% | -13.52% | -68.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.77% | -8.97% | -39.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.74% | -3.00% | -42.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.72% | — | — |
Volatility
BRF vs. OTGL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRF | OTGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.46% | 19.02% | +9.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.66% | 19.02% | +12.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.94% | 19.02% | +14.92% |
BRF vs. OTGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than OTGL's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRF vs. OTGL - Dividend Comparison
BRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than OTGL's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRF VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF | 5.28% | 5.54% | 4.08% | 5.02% | 4.13% | 2.96% | 1.66% | 2.54% | 2.89% | 4.53% | 4.25% | 3.84% |
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF | 1.83% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRF and OTGL have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OTGL.
BRF has the higher dividend yield at 5.28%, compared with 1.83% for OTGL.
BRF tracks MVIS Brazil Small-Cap Index, while OTGL tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and OTG. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BRF and 0.95% for OTGL.
Find the right allocation for BRF and OTGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer