BRF vs. EQUEY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BRF (VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF) is Latin America Equities fund tracking the MVIS Brazil Small-Cap Index, while EQUEY (Equatorial Energia SA ADR) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, BRF returned 6.61%/yr vs 15.29%/yr for EQUEY. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BRF vs. EQUEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) and Equatorial Energia SA ADR (EQUEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRF achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly lower than EQUEY's 9.96% return. Over the past 10 years, BRF has underperformed EQUEY with an annualized return of 6.61%, while EQUEY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.29% annualized return.

BRF

• 1D: -4.64%
• 1M: -10.08%
• YTD: 5.08%
• 6M: -0.52%
• 1Y: 20.45%
• 3Y*: 5.49%
• 5Y*: -3.39%
• 10Y*: 6.61%

EQUEY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -9.06%
• YTD: 9.96%
• 6M: 4.18%
• 1Y: 15.80%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: 13.17%
• 10Y*: 15.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRF vs. EQUEY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BRF VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF	5.08%	54.17%	-35.02%	37.21%	-14.38%	-20.40%	-21.07%	40.66%	-12.07%	54.63%
EQUEY Equatorial Energia SA ADR	9.96%	85.47%	-43.28%	43.37%	31.85%	-9.33%	-17.00%	45.26%	-6.01%	28.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BRF and EQUEY is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009	0.19

Return for Risk

BRF vs. EQUEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRF

BRF Risk / Return Rank: 23
BRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
BRF Omega Ratio Rank: 21
BRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
BRF Martin Ratio Rank: 26

EQUEY

EQUEY Risk / Return Rank: 56
EQUEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
EQUEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
EQUEY Omega Ratio Rank: 59
EQUEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
EQUEY Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRF vs. EQUEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) and Equatorial Energia SA ADR (EQUEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BRF	EQUEY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	0.36	+0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.14	0.80	+0.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.16	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	0.73	+0.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.58	1.88	+1.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BRF vs. EQUEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRF Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the EQUEY Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRF and EQUEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BRF	EQUEY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	0.36	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.11	0.29	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20	0.21	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.19	-0.13

Drawdowns

BRF vs. EQUEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRF drawdown since its inception was -82.26%, which is greater than EQUEY's maximum drawdown of -69.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRF and EQUEY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRF	EQUEY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.26%	-69.01%	-13.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.11%	-21.69%	+5.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.81%	-43.61%	+5.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.49%	-43.61%	-6.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.43%	-69.01%	+8.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.77%	-19.40%	-29.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.74%	-22.82%	-22.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.72%	8.42%	-2.70%

Volatility

BRF vs. EQUEY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) is 10.39%, while Equatorial Energia SA ADR (EQUEY) has a volatility of 11.08%. This indicates that BRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQUEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRF	EQUEY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.39%	11.08%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.39%	28.62%	-4.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.46%	44.81%	-16.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.66%	46.33%	-14.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.94%	74.37%	-40.43%

Dividends

BRF vs. EQUEY - Dividend Comparison

BRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than EQUEY's 3.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BRF VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF	5.28%	5.54%	4.08%	5.02%	4.13%	2.96%	1.66%	2.54%	2.89%	4.53%	4.25%	3.84%
EQUEY Equatorial Energia SA ADR	3.50%	5.81%	3.09%	1.11%	2.33%	3.16%	2.41%	0.80%	1.86%	1.30%	1.35%	1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRF and EQUEY in my portfolio?

BRF and EQUEY have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BRF or EQUEY?

EQUEY has higher volatility (11.08%) compared to BRF (10.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRF dropped -82.26% vs EQUEY's -69.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.