BRES vs. SCHK
BRES (Burney U.S. Equity Select ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. BRES is actively managed, while SCHK is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BRES charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.
Performance
BRES vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BRES
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHK
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 1Y
- 21.79%
- 3Y*
- 20.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- —
BRES vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BRES Burney U.S. Equity Select ETF | 9.57% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 9.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRES and SCHK is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2026 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRES vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank
BRES
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHK
BRES vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Burney U.S. Equity Select ETF (BRES) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRES | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.44 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRES vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRES drawdown since its inception was -9.14%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRES and SCHK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRES | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.14% | -34.80% | +25.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -1.11% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -5.15% | +3.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.05% | — |
Volatility
BRES vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRES | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.72% | 12.82% | +2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 17.35% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 19.09% | -3.37% |
BRES vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRES has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRES vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison
BRES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than SCHK's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRES Burney U.S. Equity Select ETF | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, BRES and SCHK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BRES.
SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.16% for BRES.
They also come from different issuers: Burney and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BRES and 0.03% for SCHK.
Find the right allocation for BRES and SCHK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer