PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRES vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRES vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Burney U.S. Equity Select ETF (BRES) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BRES

1D
0.17%
1M
0.20%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

SCHB

1D
0.11%
1M
0.88%
6M
7.46%
YTD
9.59%
1Y
17.60%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
11.56%
10Y*
14.42%
ALL TIME*
14.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$629.01K$455.54K$576.72K
$216.22M$219.13M$258.75M

BRES vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BRES and SCHB is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2026

0.93

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRES vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRES

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRES vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Burney U.S. Equity Select ETF (BRES) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRESSCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.54

BRES vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRES vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRES drawdown since its inception was -9.14%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRES and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRESSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.14%

-35.27%

+26.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-2.23%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.83%

-4.09%

+2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

Volatility

BRES vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRESSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.72%

12.95%

+2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

17.33%

-1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

18.31%

-2.59%

BRES vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRES has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRES vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

BRES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than SCHB's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRES
Burney U.S. Equity Select ETF
0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.05%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BRES and SCHB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BRES.

SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.16% for BRES.

They also come from different issuers: Burney and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BRES and 0.03% for SCHB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRES and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer