BREM vs. EMCB
BREM (iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF) and EMCB (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BREM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EMCB.
Performance
BREM vs. EMCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BREM achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly higher than EMCB's 2.34% return.
BREM
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 3.96%
- 6M
- 3.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMCB
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- 7.33%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 4.27%
BREM vs. EMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BREM iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF | 3.96% | 2.80% |
EMCB WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | 2.34% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between BREM and EMCB is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BREM vs. EMCB — Risk / Return Rank
BREM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EMCB
BREM vs. EMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF (BREM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BREM | EMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.47 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BREM vs. EMCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BREM drawdown since its inception was -4.54%, smaller than the maximum EMCB drawdown of -22.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BREM and EMCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BREM | EMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -22.81% | +18.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -0.34% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -4.22% | +3.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.87% | — |
Volatility
BREM vs. EMCB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BREM | EMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.59% | 3.78% | +1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.59% | 6.93% | -1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.59% | 8.46% | -2.87% |
BREM vs. EMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BREM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCB's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
BREM vs. EMCB - Dividend Comparison
BREM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than EMCB's 5.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BREM iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF | 3.88% | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMCB WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | 5.34% | 5.47% | 5.29% | 5.09% | 4.04% | 3.43% | 3.85% | 4.17% | 4.20% | 4.04% | 4.08% | 5.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BREM and EMCB have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BREM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BREM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EMCB.
EMCB has the higher dividend yield at 5.34%, compared with 3.88% for BREM.
They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BREM and 0.60% for EMCB.
Find the right allocation for BREM and EMCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer