PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRCAX vs. FFGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRCAX vs. FFGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX) and Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A (FFGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRCAX achieves a 18.63% return, which is significantly higher than FFGAX's 13.74% return. Over the past 10 years, BRCAX has underperformed FFGAX with an annualized return of 6.47%, while FFGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.04% annualized return.


BRCAX

1D
-1.27%
1M
-11.40%
YTD
18.63%
6M
17.19%
1Y
34.50%
3Y*
14.81%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
6.47%

FFGAX

1D
-1.80%
1M
-7.29%
YTD
13.74%
6M
13.29%
1Y
34.98%
3Y*
16.54%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*
12.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRCAX vs. FFGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRCAX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A
18.63%18.41%5.47%-3.44%7.77%19.18%7.75%4.20%-12.18%4.49%
FFGAX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A
13.74%28.27%2.63%-5.35%20.37%25.70%5.78%17.54%-13.44%17.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BRCAX and FFGAX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2010

0.57

The correlation between BRCAX and FFGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRCAX vs. FFGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRCAX
BRCAX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
BRCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BRCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FFGAX
FFGAX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FFGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRCAX vs. FFGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX) and Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A (FFGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRCAXFFGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

3.36

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.65

13.56

-3.91

BRCAX vs. FFGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRCAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the FFGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRCAX and FFGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRCAX vs. FFGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRCAX drawdown since its inception was -60.98%, which is greater than FFGAX's maximum drawdown of -57.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRCAX and FFGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRCAXFFGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.98%

-57.71%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.80%

-10.09%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.80%

-19.46%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.66%

-27.29%

+6.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.44%

-48.61%

+10.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.80%

-10.09%

-4.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.43%

-19.77%

-8.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

2.50%

+0.88%

Volatility

BRCAX vs. FFGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX) is 4.57%, while Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A (FFGAX) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that BRCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRCAXFFGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

5.60%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.90%

14.00%

+1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.79%

17.11%

+0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.73%

21.41%

-5.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.35%

22.41%

-8.06%

BRCAX vs. FFGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRCAX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FFGAX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRCAX vs. FFGAX - Dividend Comparison

BRCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.81%, more than FFGAX's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRCAX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A
11.81%14.02%4.85%3.80%9.98%16.92%0.00%0.89%0.17%0.00%2.58%0.00%
FFGAX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A
1.97%2.24%2.32%1.79%1.68%3.16%1.30%2.84%1.93%0.36%1.29%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRCAX and FFGAX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFGAX has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to BRCAX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRCAX dropped -60.98% vs FFGAX's -57.71%.

FFGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRCAX and FFGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer