BRCAX vs. EAPCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX).
BRCAX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Nov 30, 2010. EAPCX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on May 25, 2011.
Performance
BRCAX vs. EAPCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BRCAX vs. EAPCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCAX Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A | 27.94% | 18.41% | 5.47% | -3.44% | 7.77% | 19.18% | 7.75% | 4.20% | -12.18% | 4.49% |
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A | 16.34% | 22.06% | 9.63% | -4.87% | 17.26% | 29.92% | 7.77% | 9.19% | -9.60% | 6.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRCAX achieves a 27.94% return, which is significantly higher than EAPCX's 16.34% return. Over the past 10 years, BRCAX has underperformed EAPCX with an annualized return of 8.46%, while EAPCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.09% annualized return.
BRCAX
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 11.88%
- YTD
- 27.94%
- 6M
- 36.77%
- 1Y
- 42.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.17%
- 10Y*
- 8.46%
EAPCX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 6M
- 25.33%
- 1Y
- 32.23%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- 16.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BRCAX vs. EAPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRCAX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EAPCX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BRCAX vs. EAPCX — Risk / Return Rank
BRCAX
EAPCX
BRCAX vs. EAPCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRCAX | EAPCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.58 | 2.21 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.11 | 2.79 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.40 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.74 | 3.57 | +1.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.98 | 12.49 | +3.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRCAX | EAPCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 2.21 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 1.10 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.84 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.28 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between BRCAX and EAPCX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BRCAX vs. EAPCX - Dividend Comparison
BRCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.95%, less than EAPCX's 11.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCAX Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A | 10.95% | 14.02% | 4.85% | 3.80% | 9.98% | 16.92% | 0.00% | 0.89% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 2.58% |
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A | 11.37% | 13.23% | 5.46% | 3.43% | 14.80% | 13.74% | 3.01% | 1.11% | 0.41% | 4.98% | 6.49% |
Drawdowns
BRCAX vs. EAPCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRCAX drawdown since its inception was -60.98%, which is greater than EAPCX's maximum drawdown of -52.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRCAX and EAPCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRCAX | EAPCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.98% | -52.59% | -8.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.22% | -9.09% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.66% | -18.05% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.44% | -28.81% | -9.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -1.17% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.81% | -23.03% | -5.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 2.60% | +0.14% |
Volatility
BRCAX vs. EAPCX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) at 4.61%. This indicates that BRCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAPCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BRCAX | EAPCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.20% | 4.61% | +2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.88% | 11.77% | +3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.16% | 14.87% | +2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.64% | 14.64% | +1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 13.29% | +0.98% |