PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRCAX vs. CCRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRCAX vs. CCRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX) and Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRCAX achieves a 26.41% return, which is significantly higher than CCRSX's 23.38% return. Over the past 10 years, BRCAX has underperformed CCRSX with an annualized return of 7.37%, while CCRSX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.98% annualized return.


BRCAX

1D
-0.24%
1M
7.39%
6M
16.62%
YTD
26.41%
1Y
42.90%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
7.37%
ALL TIME*
2.18%

CCRSX

1D
-0.09%
1M
7.69%
6M
11.85%
YTD
23.38%
1Y
36.10%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
57.76%
10Y*
26.98%
ALL TIME*
8.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BRCAX vs. CCRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRCAX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A
26.41%18.41%5.47%-3.44%7.77%19.18%7.75%4.20%-12.18%4.49%
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
23.38%15.37%4.86%-8.88%15.71%667.99%-1.49%6.69%-11.63%-7.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BRCAX and CCRSX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2010

0.86

The correlation between BRCAX and CCRSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRCAX vs. CCRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BRCAX
BRCAX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BRCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BRCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

CCRSX
CCRSX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CCRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CCRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BRCAX vs. CCRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX) and Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRCAXCCRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.36

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.43

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.92

7.99

-0.07

BRCAX vs. CCRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the CCRSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRCAX and CCRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRCAX vs. CCRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRCAX drawdown since its inception was -60.98%, smaller than the maximum CCRSX drawdown of -78.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRCAX and CCRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRCAXCCRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.98%

-78.02%

+17.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.00%

-14.30%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.00%

-14.30%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.66%

-25.53%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.44%

-36.73%

-1.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.21%

-7.02%

-2.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.32%

-41.08%

+12.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.14%

4.34%

+0.80%

Volatility

BRCAX vs. CCRSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX) is 4.16%, while Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that BRCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRCAXCCRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

4.64%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.67%

14.31%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.31%

17.01%

+1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.77%

222.80%

-207.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.38%

157.66%

-143.28%

BRCAX vs. CCRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRCAX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CCRSX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRCAX vs. CCRSX - Dividend Comparison

BRCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.09%, less than CCRSX's 11.24% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BRCAX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A
11.09%14.02%4.85%3.80%9.98%16.92%0.00%0.89%0.17%0.00%2.58%
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
11.24%3.98%2.95%26.59%18.97%4.82%5.51%0.86%2.91%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, BRCAX and CCRSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CCRSX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to BRCAX (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRCAX dropped -60.98% vs CCRSX's -78.02%.

BRCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRCAX and CCRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer