BRCAX vs. CCRSX
BRCAX (Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A) and CCRSX (Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 10 years, BRCAX returned 6.60%/yr vs 25.76%/yr for CCRSX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BRCAX charges 1.40%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for CCRSX.
Performance
BRCAX vs. CCRSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRCAX achieves a 20.15% return, which is significantly higher than CCRSX's 17.09% return. Over the past 10 years, BRCAX has underperformed CCRSX with an annualized return of 6.60%, while CCRSX has yielded a comparatively higher 25.76% annualized return.
BRCAX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -10.26%
- YTD
- 20.15%
- 6M
- 19.24%
- 1Y
- 33.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 10.34%
- 10Y*
- 6.60%
CCRSX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- YTD
- 17.09%
- 6M
- 15.64%
- 1Y
- 24.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.87%
- 5Y*
- 57.50%
- 10Y*
- 25.76%
BRCAX vs. CCRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCAX Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A | 20.15% | 18.41% | 5.47% | -3.44% | 7.77% | 19.18% | 7.75% | 4.20% | -12.18% | 4.49% |
CCRSX Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio | 17.09% | 15.37% | 4.86% | -8.88% | 15.71% | 667.99% | -1.49% | 6.69% | -11.63% | -7.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRCAX and CCRSX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2010 | 0.86 |
The correlation between BRCAX and CCRSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRCAX vs. CCRSX — Risk / Return Rank
BRCAX
CCRSX
BRCAX vs. CCRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX) and Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRCAX | CCRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.25 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 1.93 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.21 | 7.48 | +2.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRCAX vs. CCRSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRCAX drawdown since its inception was -60.98%, smaller than the maximum CCRSX drawdown of -78.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRCAX and CCRSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRCAX | CCRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.98% | -78.02% | +17.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -11.76% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.71% | -11.76% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.66% | -25.53% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.44% | -36.73% | -1.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.71% | -11.76% | -1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.43% | -41.24% | +12.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 3.27% | 0.00% |
Volatility
BRCAX vs. CCRSX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) at 3.87%. This indicates that BRCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRCAX | CCRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 3.87% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.87% | 14.45% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.77% | 16.60% | +1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 222.80% | -207.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.35% | 157.73% | -143.38% |
BRCAX vs. CCRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRCAX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CCRSX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRCAX vs. CCRSX - Dividend Comparison
BRCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.66%, less than CCRSX's 11.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCAX Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A | 11.66% | 14.02% | 4.85% | 3.80% | 9.98% | 16.92% | 0.00% | 0.89% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 2.58% |
CCRSX Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio | 11.84% | 3.98% | 2.95% | 26.59% | 18.97% | 4.82% | 5.51% | 0.86% | 2.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, BRCAX and CCRSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BRCAX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to CCRSX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRCAX dropped -60.98% vs CCRSX's -78.02%.
BRCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRCAX and CCRSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer