BRC vs. NEM
BRC (Brady Corporation) and NEM (Newmont Corporation) are both stocks. BRC operates in Security & Protection Services (Industrials), while NEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, BRC returned 12.95%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for NEM. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BRC vs. NEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRC achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's -4.15% return. Over the past 10 years, BRC has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 12.95%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.79% annualized return.
BRC
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 11.38%
- 6M
- 10.30%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 1Y
- 32.23%
- 3Y*
- 25.80%
- 5Y*
- 12.38%
- 10Y*
- 12.95%
NEM
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- 6M
- -12.19%
- YTD
- -4.15%
- 1Y
- 60.16%
- 3Y*
- 32.96%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.79%
BRC vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRC Brady Corporation | 16.05% | 7.60% | 27.69% | 26.91% | -10.91% | 3.75% | -6.00% | 34.10% | 17.14% | 3.23% |
NEM Newmont Corporation | -4.15% | 172.82% | -7.83% | -8.76% | -20.77% | 7.40% | 40.28% | 30.52% | -6.15% | 10.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRC and NEM is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 1984 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
BRC:
$4.25B
NEM:
$101.73B
BRC:
$4.39
NEM:
$7.15
BRC:
20.54
NEM:
13.33
BRC:
1.62
NEM:
0.35
BRC:
2.66
NEM:
4.07
BRC:
$1.62B
NEM:
$17.23B
BRC:
$828.93M
NEM:
$8.97B
BRC:
$300.10M
NEM:
$13.78B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRC vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank
BRC
NEM
BRC vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brady Corporation (BRC) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRC | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 2.09 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.57 | 4.81 | -1.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRC vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRC drawdown since its inception was -65.62%, smaller than the maximum NEM drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRC and NEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRC | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.62% | -81.30% | +15.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.12% | -29.39% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.12% | -36.57% | +10.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.12% | -62.40% | +36.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.21% | -62.40% | +26.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.87% | -27.47% | +21.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.40% | -41.34% | +26.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.80% | 12.73% | -3.93% |
Volatility
BRC vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brady Corporation (BRC) is 6.95%, while Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 14.14%. This indicates that BRC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRC | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.95% | 14.14% | -7.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.61% | 37.29% | -7.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.51% | 47.74% | -14.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.22% | 38.15% | -11.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.01% | 35.73% | -7.72% |
Dividends
BRC vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison
BRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than NEM's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRC Brady Corporation | 1.09% | 1.23% | 1.28% | 1.58% | 1.92% | 1.64% | 1.65% | 1.49% | 1.92% | 2.17% | 2.16% | 3.49% |
NEM Newmont Corporation | 1.07% | 1.00% | 2.69% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
Financials
BRC vs. NEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brady Corporation and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BRC and NEM have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEM has higher volatility (14.14%) compared to BRC (6.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRC dropped -65.62% vs NEM's -81.30%.
NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRC and NEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer