PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRAMX vs. FUMBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRAMX vs. FUMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series M Portfolio (BRAMX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRAMX achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly higher than FUMBX's 0.09% return.


BRAMX

1D
0.47%
1M
0.83%
YTD
1.08%
6M
1.32%
1Y
5.99%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
0.35%
10Y*
1.26%

FUMBX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.09%
6M
0.44%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
4.10%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRAMX vs. FUMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRAMX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series M Portfolio
1.08%8.68%1.47%4.50%-12.45%-1.11%4.77%7.12%0.91%0.34%
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
0.09%5.83%3.25%4.47%-5.84%-1.38%4.22%4.19%1.47%-0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BRAMX and FUMBX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017

0.78

The correlation between BRAMX and FUMBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRAMX vs. FUMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRAMX
BRAMX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BRAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BRAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FUMBX
FUMBX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FUMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FUMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRAMX vs. FUMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series M Portfolio (BRAMX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRAMXFUMBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.27

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.82

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.02

5.30

+0.72

BRAMX vs. FUMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRAMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the FUMBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRAMX and FUMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRAMX vs. FUMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRAMX drawdown since its inception was -26.88%, which is greater than FUMBX's maximum drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRAMX and FUMBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRAMXFUMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.88%

-8.83%

-18.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-1.54%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.98%

-1.57%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.23%

-8.60%

-9.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-0.87%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-1.85%

-4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

0.53%

+0.49%

Volatility

BRAMX vs. FUMBX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series M Portfolio (BRAMX) has a higher volatility of 1.38% compared to Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) at 0.70%. This indicates that BRAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRAMXFUMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

0.70%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.18%

1.56%

+1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14%

2.08%

+2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.36%

2.93%

+3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.84%

2.49%

+2.35%

BRAMX vs. FUMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRAMX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FUMBX's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BRAMX vs. FUMBX - Dividend Comparison

BRAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than FUMBX's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRAMX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series M Portfolio
4.52%4.44%3.78%2.70%2.09%1.76%2.92%3.51%3.19%2.45%0.00%0.48%
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.76%3.51%2.91%1.64%0.86%1.15%1.41%1.88%1.64%0.34%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRAMX and FUMBX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRAMX has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to FUMBX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRAMX dropped -26.88% vs FUMBX's -8.83%.

BRAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRAMX and FUMBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer