PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRAMX vs. ASFYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRAMX vs. ASFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series M Portfolio (BRAMX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRAMX achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than ASFYX's 14.34% return. Over the past 10 years, BRAMX has underperformed ASFYX with an annualized return of 1.26%, while ASFYX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.90% annualized return.


BRAMX

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.20%
1Y
6.76%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
0.22%
10Y*
1.26%

ASFYX

1D
-0.78%
1M
1.37%
YTD
14.34%
6M
16.70%
1Y
25.15%
3Y*
-1.76%
5Y*
2.68%
10Y*
2.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRAMX vs. ASFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRAMX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series M Portfolio
0.72%8.68%1.47%4.50%-12.45%-1.11%4.77%7.12%0.91%1.84%
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
14.34%-9.67%-3.22%-10.33%35.67%3.52%13.59%8.99%-12.59%6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BRAMX and ASFYX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2010

-0.05

The correlation between BRAMX and ASFYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.34 (5 years) to -0.00 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRAMX vs. ASFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRAMX
BRAMX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BRAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BRAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

ASFYX
ASFYX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ASFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ASFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRAMX vs. ASFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series M Portfolio (BRAMX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRAMXASFYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.38

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

4.79

-2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.68

17.23

-10.55

BRAMX vs. ASFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRAMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the ASFYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRAMX and ASFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRAMXASFYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

2.13

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.20

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.23

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.34

-0.23

Drawdowns

BRAMX vs. ASFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRAMX drawdown since its inception was -26.88%, smaller than the maximum ASFYX drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRAMX and ASFYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRAMXASFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.88%

-36.43%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-5.24%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.98%

-30.32%

+22.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.23%

-36.43%

+18.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.27%

-36.43%

+18.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-18.87%

+17.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.25%

-13.18%

+6.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.45%

-0.49%

Volatility

BRAMX vs. ASFYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series M Portfolio (BRAMX) is 1.60%, while AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that BRAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRAMXASFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

3.75%

-2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

9.57%

-6.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.16%

11.78%

-7.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.34%

13.76%

-7.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.82%

12.71%

-7.89%

BRAMX vs. ASFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRAMX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ASFYX's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRAMX vs. ASFYX - Dividend Comparison

BRAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than ASFYX's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
1.33%1.52%1.46%0.99%32.48%6.07%3.40%5.51%1.30%0.07%0.01%5.06%
BRAMX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series M Portfolio
4.53%4.44%3.78%2.70%2.09%1.76%2.92%3.51%3.19%2.45%0.00%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRAMX and ASFYX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASFYX has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to BRAMX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRAMX dropped -26.88% vs ASFYX's -36.43%.

ASFYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRAMX and ASFYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer