PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRACX vs. LIVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRACX vs. LIVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series C Portfolio (BRACX) and BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund (LIVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRACX achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than LIVIX's 13.10% return. Over the past 10 years, BRACX has underperformed LIVIX with an annualized return of 2.25%, while LIVIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.04% annualized return.


BRACX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.78%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.63%
1Y
6.55%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
0.27%
10Y*
2.25%

LIVIX

1D
0.47%
1M
5.62%
YTD
13.10%
6M
13.99%
1Y
29.98%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
12.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRACX vs. LIVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRACX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series C Portfolio
0.73%7.97%1.02%8.05%-15.97%-1.94%11.21%14.28%-2.44%5.11%
LIVIX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund
13.10%21.57%13.60%21.62%-18.38%18.75%14.99%26.76%-7.83%21.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BRACX and LIVIX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2011

-0.03

The correlation between BRACX and LIVIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRACX vs. LIVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRACX
BRACX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BRACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRACX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BRACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRACX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

LIVIX
LIVIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LIVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
LIVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRACX vs. LIVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series C Portfolio (BRACX) and BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund (LIVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRACXLIVIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.57

2.43

-0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.35

3.37

-1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.44

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

3.22

-1.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.84

14.29

-7.45

BRACX vs. LIVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the LIVIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRACX and LIVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRACXLIVIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

2.43

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.67

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.72

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.64

-0.38

Drawdowns

BRACX vs. LIVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRACX drawdown since its inception was -22.49%, smaller than the maximum LIVIX drawdown of -34.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRACX and LIVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRACXLIVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.49%

-34.44%

+11.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

-9.44%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.79%

-17.39%

+10.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.41%

-26.45%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.49%

-34.44%

+11.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

0.00%

-2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-4.52%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

2.13%

-1.15%

Volatility

BRACX vs. LIVIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series C Portfolio (BRACX) is 1.47%, while BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund (LIVIX) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that BRACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRACXLIVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

3.86%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

10.06%

-6.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.29%

12.54%

-8.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.64%

15.84%

-9.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.94%

16.72%

-10.78%

BRACX vs. LIVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRACX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LIVIX's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BRACX vs. LIVIX - Dividend Comparison

BRACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than LIVIX's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRACX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series C Portfolio
5.27%5.29%3.95%3.09%2.63%3.46%6.38%4.15%3.67%2.85%0.20%0.86%
LIVIX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund
2.19%2.48%0.01%2.04%1.96%2.04%1.56%2.95%2.35%2.27%1.54%2.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRACX and LIVIX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LIVIX has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to BRACX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRACX dropped -22.49% vs LIVIX's -34.44%.

LIVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRACX and LIVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer