PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BR vs. GRT-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BR vs. GRT-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BR is traded in USD, while GRT-UN.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the GRT-UN.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BR achieves a -34.29% return, which is significantly lower than GRT-UN.TO's 15.06% return. Over the past 10 years, BR has underperformed GRT-UN.TO with an annualized return of 10.42%, while GRT-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.54% annualized return.


BR

1D
0.68%
1M
1.34%
YTD
-34.29%
6M
-36.25%
1Y
-38.35%
3Y*
-0.94%
5Y*
-0.50%
10Y*
10.42%

GRT-UN.TO

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.57%
YTD
15.06%
6M
22.11%
1Y
34.57%
3Y*
8.16%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
13.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BR vs. GRT-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
-34.29%0.27%11.65%56.23%-25.26%21.12%26.28%30.59%7.86%39.10%
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
15.06%28.67%-11.77%17.98%-35.94%40.23%25.54%35.22%5.57%24.29%

Correlation

The correlation between BR and GRT-UN.TO is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2007

0.19

The correlation between BR and GRT-UN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BR:

$16.95B

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$5.73B

EPS

BR:

$9.35

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$6.39

PE Ratio

BR:

15.50

GRT-UN.TO:

14.79

PEG Ratio

BR:

1.37

GRT-UN.TO:

0.91

PS Ratio

BR:

2.33

GRT-UN.TO:

9.15

PB Ratio

BR:

6.01

GRT-UN.TO:

1.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

BR:

$7.32B

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$629.87M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BR:

$2.29B

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$517.51M

EBITDA (TTM)

BR:

$1.98B

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$513.85M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BR vs. GRT-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BR
BR Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BR Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BR Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

GRT-UN.TO
GRT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BR vs. GRT-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRGRT-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.73

1.31

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

2.61

-3.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.55

8.35

-9.90

BR vs. GRT-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BR Sharpe Ratio is -1.51, which is lower than the GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BR and GRT-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BR vs. GRT-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BR drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, smaller than the maximum GRT-UN.TO drawdown of -89.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BR and GRT-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRGRT-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.02%

-89.30%

+30.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.55%

-13.29%

-32.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.55%

-31.60%

-13.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.55%

-43.95%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.55%

-49.61%

+4.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.60%

-3.42%

-41.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-18.51%

+9.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.78%

4.19%

+20.59%

Volatility

BR vs. GRT-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) has a higher volatility of 8.82% compared to Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) at 5.65%. This indicates that BR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRT-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRGRT-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.82%

5.65%

+3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.61%

15.73%

+5.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.53%

19.84%

+5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.44%

23.11%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.90%

23.53%

+0.37%

Dividends

BR vs. GRT-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

BR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than GRT-UN.TO's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
2.69%1.66%1.49%1.48%2.04%1.33%1.46%1.66%1.77%1.53%1.90%2.12%
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
3.68%4.18%4.74%4.21%4.50%2.86%3.43%4.25%5.69%5.31%5.42%1.62%

Financials

BR vs. GRT-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.95B
165.83M
(BR) Total Revenue
(GRT-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BR values in USD, GRT-UN.TO values in CAD

BR vs. GRT-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
32.1%
81.0%
Portfolio components
BR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 626.90M and revenue of 1.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.

GRT-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 134.27M and revenue of 165.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.0%.

BR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 359.50M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

GRT-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 122.29M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 73.7%.

BR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 276.30M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.

GRT-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 91.25M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in a net margin of 55.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BR and GRT-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BR and GRT-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer